It's drop 60: https://qalerts.app/?n=60
You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands. Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military. Why is this relevant? Game theory. Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information. Operators never divulge. Alice & Wonderland.
Specifically this line:
Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.
I've never seen anyone focus in on that one. But it's ALWAYS stood out to me. One of the craziest things about all this is who would have been in on it from the beginning, right? This post, and that line, seem to be telling us that someone else is part of this, but...only potentially...
So even team Q wasn't sure? Who is this one, apparently special person? And how are they actually related to the plan? Who would have all the same information as the original Q people, but not really be part of them? And what is their mission? Where did they get their orders from? And why are they a "potential" operator?
It's simply stating that everything is compartmentalized. Operators are given a specific mission, they have no knowledge of the overall plan. Only less than 10 have the complete picture. That way there is less chance of leaks, either intentional, accidental or forced. It's safer for the operators and the security of the overall plan. This is how a lot of large covert operations are managed. Take for instance the Manhattan Project. Although there were thousands of people involved, including hundreds of scientists, only a few people knew the overall plan. Every team worked on their specific project isolated from what the other teams were doing.
I'm just going to copy/paste my response to someone who made a similar argument:
If that were the case they would have just "outside of potential operators". They specifically said "a" singular operator and the post is about the people who have a birds eye view of the plan.
I'm not trying to be rude, but grammatically you take isn't correct, and, as we know, details are important.
General "special operators" wouldn't be in on the initial plan, nor would they "have the full scope", which is what that post says that potential operator has.
but they said "his/her mission"...
so that means generic operators, One of which might be specifically called upon.
The enemy would like to know as much about this person as they can, so they didn't want to specify their gender. The post is talking about who has the full picture. They mention a, singular operator, who has the full picture. The kind of person you are talking about would not have that information.
They are dialed in with order specific to their mission based on their shared knowledge of the full picture.
The grammar of this line:
only makes sense if that potential operator has the same information as: