As far as i understand it, the Spike Protein itself is not bonded to either the RNA or your DNA. Rather, the mRNA injections encode production of the Spike Protein. The concept was that the spike protein triggers the immune system into producing a response that attacks 'covid' infections (virus).
Part of the problem is that the spike protein itself is toxic, and its causing damage to people. So clearing out the spike protein is an important part of treatment. It's about detoxifying the body of the toxin that the injections cause production of.
Treatment often involves dealing with symptoms. Not all illnesses, for example, are curable, and in such cases, treatment involves ameliorating the damage caused by the disease.
The article is talking about how some of the damage being caused by the injections can be reversed. In other words, counteracting the damage caused by the injections.
The spike protein is not part of anyone's DNA or genome. That's a whole different topic.
The spike protein is not part of anyone's DNA or genome.
Evidence suggests reverse transcription of mRNA into a DNA copy is possible. This further suggests the possibility of intergenerational transmission if germline cells incorporate the DNA copy into the host genome.
Yeah, but the point is, the spike protein is not the mRNA component. It is what the mRNA component engages the cell to produce.
I'm just addressing the OP comment that incorrectly draws an equivalence between the spike protein itself and the genetic components in the injections or the recipient's DNA.
The video provides a pretty clear explanation of this:
meaning if a person has never had vaccines injuries or adverse events, they just have to detox the toxin from the body? that seems way too easy to my knowledge
As far as i understand it, the Spike Protein itself is not bonded to either the RNA or your DNA. Rather, the mRNA injections encode production of the Spike Protein. The concept was that the spike protein triggers the immune system into producing a response that attacks 'covid' infections (virus).
Part of the problem is that the spike protein itself is toxic, and its causing damage to people. So clearing out the spike protein is an important part of treatment. It's about detoxifying the body of the toxin that the injections cause production of.
Treatment often involves dealing with symptoms. Not all illnesses, for example, are curable, and in such cases, treatment involves ameliorating the damage caused by the disease.
The article is talking about how some of the damage being caused by the injections can be reversed. In other words, counteracting the damage caused by the injections.
The spike protein is not part of anyone's DNA or genome. That's a whole different topic.
Evidence suggests reverse transcription of mRNA into a DNA copy is possible. This further suggests the possibility of intergenerational transmission if germline cells incorporate the DNA copy into the host genome.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452662/
Yeah, but the point is, the spike protein is not the mRNA component. It is what the mRNA component engages the cell to produce.
I'm just addressing the OP comment that incorrectly draws an equivalence between the spike protein itself and the genetic components in the injections or the recipient's DNA.
The video provides a pretty clear explanation of this:
https://rumble.com/v4slxuz-how-mrna-vaccine-cell-damage-can-be-reversed-through-lipid-replacement-ther.html
Vaccinated people have their DNA altered (corrupted).
No argument there. But the spike protein is what the genetic material produces, NOT the genetic material itself.
meaning if a person has never had vaccines injuries or adverse events, they just have to detox the toxin from the body? that seems way too easy to my knowledge