https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZRwlYtAMps
55-minutes (the first 4 minutes are ads, last few minutes credits, so about 45-minutes of content)
My TLDW:
He starts by explaining that patents can be seized by the government if they “are important for national security.”
Then he talks about a couple of inventors who invented cars that could run on literal gas vapors, making mileage like 200 miles a gallon (first one was over 100 years ago, I think the second one was sixties?). Then a guy who invented a car that ran on water (early 70s). Then some people who created machines that could generate energy out of the atmosphere, which is basically unlimited free energy (one of them in the 60s).
All these people had their patents seized, labs broken into and all their material stolen and were either financially/professionally ruined or killed (or both).
Interestingly, one guy re-patented all these things with the US military as the owner of the patents, so it appears that the military has stolen these patents and are utilizing these technologies while keeping them from the public.
He goes on to talk about the serious flaws with the current green energy “solutions” being touted.
He shows that there never was an energy shortage, it was a control tool and that the green energy “solutions” are simply measures that will ensure that powerful people stay in power.
I was thinking of devices that harvest electricity using materials that naturally are described as having static electricity, and that kinetically offload the energy, putting it into a capacitor or battery before releasing the material again to gather more ambient energy. Like a heat pump or a condenser, but for electricity. Thanks for the book reference.
There are many ways. I personally prefer stuff that is visible, stuff that generates physical power. The concepts behind much "theory" are necessarily vague (by the powers that be), such that departure from their theoretical nonsense provides means for them to be derogatory. There are many methods of generation that provide far more efficient use of input than the currently accepted methods: those include generators that go no load to full load with little or no increase in input. Those are considered 'over unity' by those of us in that line of work. While there IS input, in all cases the output can be rerouted partially to provide the input power. In one case, a 2kW generator (no moving parts) was powered by a 9v battery, the little ones used in smoke detectors and such. That particular device used tank circuits to power a fluctuating magnetic field (fields from permanent magnets, essentially switched from path to path) to generate. The output was in form unusable, since it was high voltage and about 20kHz. The power was tested using 20 100W incandescent light bulbs. Such an output can easily be transformed and rectified to provide power to charge batteries in an adulterated solar setup, using fewer batteries, no solar, and the inverters available for solar. Since the power is available 24-7, it wouldn't matter that the battery bank was much smaller. Other means of generation to charge/provide power to the inverter also. Transport is somewhat different, since the power requirements are greater, but pulse motors are the prime suspect for that moving. Since pulse motors can be made to recover much used energy (energy that is normally dumped), the generator doesn't need to be equivalent to the drive requirement.
Thanks for the detailed response.