https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZRwlYtAMps
55-minutes (the first 4 minutes are ads, last few minutes credits, so about 45-minutes of content)
My TLDW:
He starts by explaining that patents can be seized by the government if they “are important for national security.”
Then he talks about a couple of inventors who invented cars that could run on literal gas vapors, making mileage like 200 miles a gallon (first one was over 100 years ago, I think the second one was sixties?). Then a guy who invented a car that ran on water (early 70s). Then some people who created machines that could generate energy out of the atmosphere, which is basically unlimited free energy (one of them in the 60s).
All these people had their patents seized, labs broken into and all their material stolen and were either financially/professionally ruined or killed (or both).
Interestingly, one guy re-patented all these things with the US military as the owner of the patents, so it appears that the military has stolen these patents and are utilizing these technologies while keeping them from the public.
He goes on to talk about the serious flaws with the current green energy “solutions” being touted.
He shows that there never was an energy shortage, it was a control tool and that the green energy “solutions” are simply measures that will ensure that powerful people stay in power.
uh thanks for this explanation . I never knew about this.
My theory is that scientists like Freud or Einstein did everything and want to keep us limited and not "in the know"
I suspect there is an outside, opposing force that fears or wants Humanity subjugated before we discover something.
IMO your theory is correct. The history re QM implies that is was installed to divert science from previous theory to something that can't be understood, since it will never be complete. One indication is that 'theoretical physics' is based on "higher math" (calculus), which itself is approximation. This form has 'i' (imaginary) numbers and such, and utilizes such a pi, which is an imaginary number (has no solution). Also, the formulae developed in the 1800s had to be modified to fit QM. Since those formulae were developed experimentally, from visible results, they were accurate; the modified forms are not. Such garbage as Einstein's relativity and such are also illogical. For instance, the claim is that nothing can exceed the speed of light, because mass increases to the point of infinity at the speed of light. Inherently, not only is that impossible (since QM itself denies particulate existence), it is in the foolish domain, simply because astronomy has recorded quasars exceeding that speed. You also have astronomers who have stated the "red shift" (expanding universe) ia ballyhoo, but their statements get modified after their deaths. QM explanations demand the 'big bang', also something denied by QM. Discussing such 'requirements' as "virtual photons" with the 'inventor' (Feynman) was an exercise in futility: a primary real law of physics is neither matter nor energy can be created or destroyed but may be changed back and forth. Feynman required his virtual photons to magically appear when the math needed them, and disappear when no longer necessary (moving 'electrons' from valence ring to valence ring requires charge of energy, supposedly carried by the fake photons). Feynman said, "You just don't understand." but I did; he didn't. Time, which is used everywhere in formulae, doesn't really exist as an entity: it is merely a reference, and as such cannot influence anything. Light is claimed to be particle and wave: if space is empty, it must be particle, but virtually every test indicates wave. If wave, light can't travel through empty space, and none of this would exist in the cold vacuum.
You see anomalies everywhere.
Can't make money from free and abundant energy. Must keep it limited. That and restricting understanding of math and physics is of importance to the khazars (and the crap can be traced there). In my opinion, there is enough real physics around so anyone with an inventive mind and basic knowledge of it can develop a method of producing non-grid electric, without using the standard "off grid" junk like windmills and solar panels. Both are notoriously inefficient and terribly inefficient cost-wise.
I call this "stupid or limited science" or sometimes "jewish science".
You knew Feynman personally? Does he indeed had such a nice personality ?
From your examples it is clear we know nothing about universe and how things work.
Feynman: long story, I'll make it short. Long time ago, I worked with an engineer (when I was going thru skool) who thought he was the gift of engineering. He had a thing about joining Mensa; wanted it badly. He brought in a digest that had a 'practice test' for the club. Just as a lark, I bought on of the mags and sent in the completed test; Mensa accepted my GCT/ARI navy scores as the IQ test, and I joined. Really pissed him off. Mensa then had 'gatherings', which were the only things I found interesting. Among the people at those were Feynman, Fuller, Asimov, Heinlein and the like. Those four in particular became friends; when they were in town, they made a point of spending Saturday mornings at my place, with coffee and such. Many good discussions took place, but to be honest, the best werre with Bucky Fuller and Robert Heinlein. That is how, and friend types. Didn't care much for the goofball that 'invented' scientology: he was something of an ass. Wish there had been others there, but... Those guys DID aid in my formation of philosophy, particularly scientific philosophy.
Universe. Right. One thing that has always annoyed me is the lack of reason/logic involved in current junk. As a consequence, and because of Nam, I had difficulties keeping a job. Eventually, I did figure that one out, and became a contract engineer. Also eventually, apparently I developed a reputation as one who could come in and fix things no one else seemed able to. Personally, I didn't, and still don't, consider that to be particularly exceptional: only open-minded and willing to consider options beyond standard physics. And we don't know anything, publicly, about universe and how things work. A little bit is known in public, but I suspect a lot is known by certain entities, among those Naval Intelligence. Also, I'm fairly certain that the clown world lost access to a lot during Trump's time in office, because some things were used (that I know of) that were stopped around 2018.
You were among ans possibly are a genius . Wow. I have questions if you dont mind:
What is your belief about Universe and how it looks works? scifi like or vedas like?
Qantum?
What is your opinion on God and religions?
Did Asimov and Feynman were loyal to their tribes first or were liberal scientists the most?
What do you think about khazarian jewish conspiracy of today?