A FOUND NASA DOCUMENT PLANS FOR ALL HUMANITY TO BE DESTROYED BY 2025 - ADVANCED WEAPONS TO BE USED
(www.bitchute.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
NASA is the mother snake of all evil. I don't care what all the Left brain oriented users lurk here say or think and not reading walls of texts with so called 'critical thinking'. Quoting from multiple websites that claim to "debunk" the evil's narratives do not change the opinions of us in the know. Its a controlled opposition.
People who follow NASA for all the educational materials they provide or trust anything they say about our physical existence, cosmological models, planets, stars and even shape of the earth, etc will have a rude awakening someday and may not even make it to recover from it.
Thanks for the vote of confidence. I read thru the documents and found several pages.
72, 82, and 92 exactly what we are seeing today. I don't really listen to what she said but actually look at the document. I know some seem to think this is just a fear porn but if I am seeing that many things fitting, it's a planning.
Bless you sir. I needed that.
Just fyi, unvaxxed, I did not take one single peek at any so-called debunking websites. Also, to the best of my ability, I always bring both left and right brain thinking to my digestion of information. But truth be told, I absolutely rely on my right much more than my left. I have just found that the left can be very useful for articulating the conclusions and insights of the right.
I also don't have any particular position on NASA, one way or another. All I did was a) look at this woman's interpretations and claims and then b) look at the document she is referring to and then 3) contrasted and compared the two.
By the way, most of that contrast and compare analysis is based on a lifetime of professional experience with powerpoint creation and use, specifically the language element. This doesn't necessarily mean I'm correct, but it does speak to the point that I'm not just pulling some theory or 'debunking' out of my ar*e.
I mention this only because your reference to "critical thinking" and walls of text seems to me to be a direct reference to my own comments.
Regardless of what NASA is or was, this woman's interpretations are out of kilter and leave a lot to be desired in terms of any sort of Q-type analysis.
Just by glancing your comments you remind me of myself 10 to 15 years ago. But these days I am very selective with my time and my 'past me' is not in that list.