Just fyi, unvaxxed, I did not take one single peek at any so-called debunking websites. Also, to the best of my ability, I always bring both left and right brain thinking to my digestion of information. But truth be told, I absolutely rely on my right much more than my left. I have just found that the left can be very useful for articulating the conclusions and insights of the right.

I also don't have any particular position on NASA, one way or another. All I did was a) look at this woman's interpretations and claims and then b) look at the document she is referring to and then 3) contrasted and compared the two.

By the way, most of that contrast and compare analysis is based on a lifetime of professional experience with powerpoint creation and use, specifically the language element. This doesn't necessarily mean I'm correct, but it does speak to the point that I'm not just pulling some theory or 'debunking' out of my ar*e.

I mention this only because your reference to "critical thinking" and walls of text seems to me to be a direct reference to my own comments.

Regardless of what NASA is or was, this woman's interpretations are out of kilter and leave a lot to be desired in terms of any sort of Q-type analysis.