A FOUND NASA DOCUMENT PLANS FOR ALL HUMANITY TO BE DESTROYED BY 2025 - ADVANCED WEAPONS TO BE USED
(www.bitchute.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
I am sorry. I know you like to rip things apart and look at it in a critical thinking mode. It's good.
You are assuming that I listen to her and believe what she said on everything. What I mostly based this on, are several other things instead of what she said.
You might want to check out page 82 and see what you can find. This is where we are today unfortunately. Let me make sure you see it: "Banking System, Railroad Attack, take down of Auto Industry." That's what we are seeing today. Is it really done by foreigners? Ask yourself that.
Now page 92 is also a good one. Anti-U.S. RMA "Strategies/Tactics"
Degrade U.S. Info Dominance. Are we seeing this today? We are. Do I believe it is good. Yes, because we have been lying to the world and our own people using CNN syndrome.
Page 72, "Natural Warfare"
Utilize animals as delivery systems. Bill Gates been using mosquitoes. I have not been seeing rats or anything being present. Is it all part of the plan? You decide.
Thanks Brain.
Just for me, the main issue I have here is that you make the post using the Headline of the Video itself, which is actually a Statement of Fact, rather than posting the content with a question or invitation to question, or apply some critical thinking.
The claim that "the documents plans for all humanity to be destroyed by 2025" is gross and fear pornish.
Why not make the post with something like: VIDEO CLAIMS: "A FOUND NASA DOCUMENT PLANS FOR ALL HUMANITY TO BE DESTROYED BY 2025 - ADVANCED WEAPONS TO BE USED "
This would at least invite readers to consider the question of whether the claim is correct or not.
Anyway, that's just me.
I do think there is a lot of potentially more nuanced review of the content. But the way it is presented is that it is some sort of Elders of Zion type document, rather than an analysis of what might happen.
If the document is accurate, and in fact predicted well the current situation, then it's worth asking is it a plan, or is it an analysis of THEIR plan?
I'll take a closer look. I personally suspect that the truth is much more in the middle ground, but I often feel compelled to kickback on certain takes because of how one-sided they are (or rather, how one sided they appear to me).
We see the damage and wasted potential of anons and people everywhere because they too quickly exchange one matrix (the mainstream propaganda) for another matrix (the fear-based anti-matrix matrix). At least I do.
The question is, is this presentation a blueprint? or is it an analysis? Either way, it may well reveal some or all of what the Cabal has planned, but the premise of the woman in the video is: Nasa published THEIR own plan openly and brazenly.
Anyway, thanks for the reply. I appreciate the clear response. It gives me more to think about.
Like I said, those 3 pages and there's others including lasers that signaled to me that we are looking at a plan they put together a while back. Obviously someone tripped up their plan (call it GAW or Trump) so they cannot carry it out.
I am not a writer so I grab headlines and post. You have seen this b4. Sorry.
Thanks BD.
Yeah, I appreciate that you're explaining to me why you thought the content is legit and saw no reason to give a heads up in your subject title.
However, I'll say this: you don't have to be a writer to review the content that lays the foundation (or not) for the headlines, and apply some discernment or critical thinking to evaluate it. (Although in this case, as you say, you did that!)
You only have to consider whether what might be the potential negative impacts if what you are posting is fake, false, misleading, unhelpful or low effort. In other words, vet it.
You also do not need to be a writer to modify your own subject line to indicate things like SOURCE, like CLAIM, like FORMAT, etc.
Anyway, this is all just feedback from me. And I appreciate you being willing to read and not react.