A FOUND NASA DOCUMENT PLANS FOR ALL HUMANITY TO BE DESTROYED BY 2025 - ADVANCED WEAPONS TO BE USED
(www.bitchute.com)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
Frankly, I don't think you've applied any critical thinking to this, but again, as usual, you just copy/paste the exact headline of the publisher, the video on Bitchute.
And t̶h̶a̶t̶ what happens when people don't apply any critical thinking or discernment to the information is the very common confirmation bias kicking in, which triggers further emotional reaction and short-circuits the critical thinking capacity (fight or flight response is triggered, undermining discernment).
Take the stuff she says at 1:44. Note: she is reading from a discussion of ANTI-US RMA strategies. The whole document is a theoretical discussion of the possibilities oif future warfare, and its plainly obvious from the context that this section is talking about what potential strategies might be used AGAINST the USA.
This is exactly what you would want from any serious military document looking into the future and analyzing possible risks and responses.
So its clear from the context (https://archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025/page/n91/mode/2up) that the paper is talking about potential attacks on the USA. (Which make sense, that an enemy would capture torture us citizens and broadcast that in order to terrorize the population.)
But she interprets this as the Illuminati and NASA as saying "we're going to capture/torture Americans in living color on prime time". INSTEAD of the very obvious "The enemy may potentially capture/torture Americans in living color on prime time". I mean, it's pretty fricking obvious, this is already what some terrorist s do, right? Remember Isis with beheading videos, etc.?
Her interpretation does NOT stand up to critical thinking at all. I understand that she believes it. But this is the problem and why so many 'conspiracy theories' in the past could NOT get traction. Because they did NOT apply the critical thinking research and analysis that Q made the hallmark of the Q operation.
I'm glad the mods did NOT sticky this. It's really low grade posting, u/brain_dead . If you are going to post this sort of stuff, at least apply some analysis or critical thinking instead of just copy/pasting into the subject line (imo).
Even listening to 5 minutes of her argument shows how distorted (aka disconnected from reality, driven by a confirmation bias) her interpretation is.
Another example: https://archive.org/details/FutureStrategicIssuesFutureWarfareCirca2025/page/n65/mode/2up
It's clear from the context and theme of the document that this page is talking about potential disadvantages for humans in warfare (i.e. using soldiers to fight war) vs. the advantages of using robotics to wage war.
Now, we can certainly discuss the ethical implications of using robots to fight war instead of humans, and the advantages / disadvantages, and the long-term risks, etc, but SHE interprets the page to be saying why NASA wants to get rid of human beings and replace them with Robots FULL STOP. She interprets the document to be a declaration of war on human beings, INSTEAD of what it clearly states it is: a discussion of the ways that warfare might evolve, and what steps could be take to counter the threats against the USA.
Critical thinking, folks, Critical thinking.
She MISINTERPRETS a discussion of possible future issues affecting warfare (around 2025) and sees it as a declaration of warfare on human beings. This is what happens when you don't check your own biases or consider contexts and OTHER possible explanations for what you are seeing/reading. She justifies her interpretation by saying "Oh, its a declaration of what the Illuminati want to do to us" instead of the obvious interpretations that make sense.
Thank you. The lack of critical thought around here is amazing. Couple that with the way people who think differently are treated and you come to realize that this place is full of people who don't think any clearer, or respect people's varying viewpoints, any better than the people considered brainwashed sheep.
Have observed the same censorship/condemnation issue myself here. Was it inevitable?
Yep. For/to me, recent shall-we-say "heavy-handedness" has been somewhere between disappointing and repulsive. Makes me wonder about infiltration, TBH.
I’ve been saying it since Voat went bye-bye, this place sucks, but what are you gonna do.
Always enjoy your perspective on things. I see you more of a narrative dissector than a narrative buster
Thank you! Great post, good points.
"I'm glad the mods did NOT sticky this." And it is now sticky'd. Guess I better give it a listen to see what the fuss is about.
kek!!!!
yeah, that one comment was in response to a discussion in another comment thread, where the OP had requested a sticky, but it had been declined (apparently) and then someone else also saying it should be stickied.
In the end, u/Lonewolf stickied it, but not simply as a reactive affirmation of the content, but to raise it to attention of the board for more critical review. And that context for the sticky, I'm more than happy with.
I occasionally have concerns that sometimes content is stickied without that sort of content, and much of the board simply reads the headline, clicks an upvote without applying any critical review.
Edit:
Couldn't hurt. Listen, think, and make up your own mind. That's what it's all about, fren!
I am sorry. I know you like to rip things apart and look at it in a critical thinking mode. It's good.
You are assuming that I listen to her and believe what she said on everything. What I mostly based this on, are several other things instead of what she said.
You might want to check out page 82 and see what you can find. This is where we are today unfortunately. Let me make sure you see it: "Banking System, Railroad Attack, take down of Auto Industry." That's what we are seeing today. Is it really done by foreigners? Ask yourself that.
Now page 92 is also a good one. Anti-U.S. RMA "Strategies/Tactics"
Degrade U.S. Info Dominance. Are we seeing this today? We are. Do I believe it is good. Yes, because we have been lying to the world and our own people using CNN syndrome.
Page 72, "Natural Warfare"
Utilize animals as delivery systems. Bill Gates been using mosquitoes. I have not been seeing rats or anything being present. Is it all part of the plan? You decide.
Thanks Brain.
Just for me, the main issue I have here is that you make the post using the Headline of the Video itself, which is actually a Statement of Fact, rather than posting the content with a question or invitation to question, or apply some critical thinking.
The claim that "the documents plans for all humanity to be destroyed by 2025" is gross and fear pornish.
Why not make the post with something like: VIDEO CLAIMS: "A FOUND NASA DOCUMENT PLANS FOR ALL HUMANITY TO BE DESTROYED BY 2025 - ADVANCED WEAPONS TO BE USED "
This would at least invite readers to consider the question of whether the claim is correct or not.
Anyway, that's just me.
I do think there is a lot of potentially more nuanced review of the content. But the way it is presented is that it is some sort of Elders of Zion type document, rather than an analysis of what might happen.
If the document is accurate, and in fact predicted well the current situation, then it's worth asking is it a plan, or is it an analysis of THEIR plan?
I'll take a closer look. I personally suspect that the truth is much more in the middle ground, but I often feel compelled to kickback on certain takes because of how one-sided they are (or rather, how one sided they appear to me).
We see the damage and wasted potential of anons and people everywhere because they too quickly exchange one matrix (the mainstream propaganda) for another matrix (the fear-based anti-matrix matrix). At least I do.
The question is, is this presentation a blueprint? or is it an analysis? Either way, it may well reveal some or all of what the Cabal has planned, but the premise of the woman in the video is: Nasa published THEIR own plan openly and brazenly.
Anyway, thanks for the reply. I appreciate the clear response. It gives me more to think about.
Like I said, those 3 pages and there's others including lasers that signaled to me that we are looking at a plan they put together a while back. Obviously someone tripped up their plan (call it GAW or Trump) so they cannot carry it out.
I am not a writer so I grab headlines and post. You have seen this b4. Sorry.
Thanks BD.
Yeah, I appreciate that you're explaining to me why you thought the content is legit and saw no reason to give a heads up in your subject title.
However, I'll say this: you don't have to be a writer to review the content that lays the foundation (or not) for the headlines, and apply some discernment or critical thinking to evaluate it. (Although in this case, as you say, you did that!)
You only have to consider whether what might be the potential negative impacts if what you are posting is fake, false, misleading, unhelpful or low effort. In other words, vet it.
You also do not need to be a writer to modify your own subject line to indicate things like SOURCE, like CLAIM, like FORMAT, etc.
Anyway, this is all just feedback from me. And I appreciate you being willing to read and not react.