It's okay to force the conversation. Let anyone come at him accusing of bias and show 'evidence' to the contrary. They'd still be proving the correlation, highlighting the insane discrepancy between outcomes in vax vs non-vax families. This is why they won't engage- they know that any conclusion based on facts is bad for their side, and therefore we must force the conversations.

Also from a biochemical perspective, it's not bs- the immune system attacks from youth make the developing brain and body much more susceptible to everything than intact, strong systems are. It's like comparing a person who lives in a polluted city, starts smoking and gets lung cancer, with a person in the country who smokes a pipe all their lives and never even coughs. The cumulative system attacks add up, and the sharp tipping point proves that- would fully healthy kids be as susceptible to the perverted programming? We will see in a few years, as the plandemic kids who didn't get full vax schedules as babies grow up.