Skepticism is good, but this is not really a sign that PDJT is CIC. It's a data point.
Another data point is PDJT retruthing a meme comparing the Commander in Thief against the Commander in Chief. Everything coming out about the fraudulent prosecutions, revocation of PDJT's authority to deploy the national guard on J6, Michael Avenatti testifying in support of PDJT, etc. are all additional data points. Alone, each one is insignificant indeed.
The art is to collect all of the data points, connect them, then paint the picture, which is WINNING.
Yes, "pattern recognition" is what sets us apart from the normies. Personally, I'd love to see a lot more data points to get a larger picture of what is going on.
Skepticism is good, but this is not really a sign that PDJT is CIC. It's a data point.
Another data point is PDJT retruthing a meme comparing the Commander in Thief against the Commander in Chief. Everything coming out about the fraudulent prosecutions, revocation of PDJT's authority to deploy the national guard on J6, Michael Avenatti testifying in support of PDJT, etc. are all additional data points. Alone, each one is insignificant indeed.
The art is to collect all of the data points, connect them, then paint the picture, which is WINNING.
Yes, "pattern recognition" is what sets us apart from the normies. Personally, I'd love to see a lot more data points to get a larger picture of what is going on.
They're everywhere. Part of the recognition is also in recognizing the data points themselves.