Provisionally, I would first be skeptical of this video. But if it were true, there would be MANY MORE of those letters sent out. If we were to see hundreds, even thousands, of them discussed, that might lend credence to this.
Another thought... they guy reading that purported "letter" would have gained a modicum of credibility if he had shown it to the camera. We just have his word for it that he's reading from a letter. Show the damned thing, already.
I need more data, that's all. This is the ONLY example of this claim that I have seen on this subject, and I've been looking for others. If you can point to other examples, we'd ALL like to see them. But this one random guy saying this means nothing.
Yeah, you're probably right. I gave up on her on TS, and now I can't even find her account there. I was looking for it on TS this morning after seeing this video to see if there was confirmation, but she seems to have left TS... or has been driven off.
Sauce on that accusation please. Accusations without sauce places suspicion on your motives. Not everyone is aware of this. I am not and am immersed in this shit daily.
I don't have all the sauce at hand, The M/g show did the digging on her. They came up with proof of what she said about Trump and Epstein Island, and her threats about turning anons into the FBI. Every one wants to believe her because of the boost Trump gave her interview.
And who is the M/g show? Why should we believe what they say? Is any other outlet confirming? Or even talking about it? Sorry, I am not so easily distracted.
I thought (and posted) that too. But then I realized that IF he is truly reading (or "not" reading) from a classified document, then it would be illegal to show it. So it's a Catch-22 situation.
Still, I will need a LOT more substantiating evidence before I will believe this.
An involuntary recall letter would NOT be classified. It would be sent through the US Postal Service (unless they issued this guy a SCIF for his house, which of course they didn’t)
We are in the midst of psychological warfare. I remain skeptical and emotionally detached from all news. There is no other way to apply logical reasoned thought. Of course, stoicism comes naturally to me.
Skepticism is good, but this is not really a sign that PDJT is CIC. It's a data point.
Another data point is PDJT retruthing a meme comparing the Commander in Thief against the Commander in Chief. Everything coming out about the fraudulent prosecutions, revocation of PDJT's authority to deploy the national guard on J6, Michael Avenatti testifying in support of PDJT, etc. are all additional data points. Alone, each one is insignificant indeed.
The art is to collect all of the data points, connect them, then paint the picture, which is WINNING.
Yes, "pattern recognition" is what sets us apart from the normies. Personally, I'd love to see a lot more data points to get a larger picture of what is going on.
Provisionally, I would first be skeptical of this video. But if it were true, there would be MANY MORE of those letters sent out. If we were to see hundreds, even thousands, of them discussed, that might lend credence to this.
Until then, I'm skeptical.
Consider the source, She said Trump went to pedo island, got called out on it. She threatened to turn Anons in to the FBI. "who would do that?????"
Another thought... they guy reading that purported "letter" would have gained a modicum of credibility if he had shown it to the camera. We just have his word for it that he's reading from a letter. Show the damned thing, already.
Exactly, no show . no trust...
Didn’t he just say it’s national security law. That’s why the ambiguity.
If you won't believe his word, then why would you believe a letter that HE shows to you? That's illogical.
I can print a letter right now. How does that help?
I need more data, that's all. This is the ONLY example of this claim that I have seen on this subject, and I've been looking for others. If you can point to other examples, we'd ALL like to see them. But this one random guy saying this means nothing.
Yeah, you're probably right. I gave up on her on TS, and now I can't even find her account there. I was looking for it on TS this morning after seeing this video to see if there was confirmation, but she seems to have left TS... or has been driven off.
Truth is not a place for her.....
Sauce on that accusation please. Accusations without sauce places suspicion on your motives. Not everyone is aware of this. I am not and am immersed in this shit daily.
I don't have all the sauce at hand, The M/g show did the digging on her. They came up with proof of what she said about Trump and Epstein Island, and her threats about turning anons into the FBI. Every one wants to believe her because of the boost Trump gave her interview.
And who is the M/g show? Why should we believe what they say? Is any other outlet confirming? Or even talking about it? Sorry, I am not so easily distracted.
me too, he should have shown the actual letter in the video.
I thought (and posted) that too. But then I realized that IF he is truly reading (or "not" reading) from a classified document, then it would be illegal to show it. So it's a Catch-22 situation.
Still, I will need a LOT more substantiating evidence before I will believe this.
An involuntary recall letter would NOT be classified. It would be sent through the US Postal Service (unless they issued this guy a SCIF for his house, which of course they didn’t)
This is a larp.
We are in the midst of psychological warfare. I remain skeptical and emotionally detached from all news. There is no other way to apply logical reasoned thought. Of course, stoicism comes naturally to me.
Wise.
Skepticism is good, but this is not really a sign that PDJT is CIC. It's a data point.
Another data point is PDJT retruthing a meme comparing the Commander in Thief against the Commander in Chief. Everything coming out about the fraudulent prosecutions, revocation of PDJT's authority to deploy the national guard on J6, Michael Avenatti testifying in support of PDJT, etc. are all additional data points. Alone, each one is insignificant indeed.
The art is to collect all of the data points, connect them, then paint the picture, which is WINNING.
Yes, "pattern recognition" is what sets us apart from the normies. Personally, I'd love to see a lot more data points to get a larger picture of what is going on.
They're everywhere. Part of the recognition is also in recognizing the data points themselves.
Earned Wisdom. But a journey of a thousand miles begins with a SINGLE step.
And this man appears to be telling the TRUTH.