I was able to find the motion with the footnote and read it, but haven't found Nauta's original filing, but it appears all he is asking for is more time. He's not claiming some grand big thing.
The deadline is next week. So we will see if the judge grants more time or something else.
The trial date is still set to later this month. She has yet to move it
I didnt say Nuatas lawyer is claiming anything. All he said is that when he tried to cross reference he was stymied. It is others claiming evidence tampering because what Nuatas attorney is describing is exactly that.
I think what is being described is tampering with evidence.
I was able to find the motion with the footnote and read it, but haven't found Nauta's original filing, but it appears all he is asking for is more time. He's not claiming some grand big thing.
The deadline is next week. So we will see if the judge grants more time or something else.
The trial date is still set to later this month. She has yet to move it
I didnt say Nuatas lawyer is claiming anything. All he said is that when he tried to cross reference he was stymied. It is others claiming evidence tampering because what Nuatas attorney is describing is exactly that.
Yes, I think other people are exaggerating the extent of the "tampering" but I only read one side which is why I want read what Nauta's lawyers said.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1fYiYsv/stunning-admission-jack-smith-de/c/
This isnt being exaggerated. They tampered with the evidence.