I’ve seen this stat for a couple years. I think it was a very small sampling and then over half of the women they were tracking just disappeared out of the study. The number they were left to analyze was now even smaller and the miscarriages, which did occur, represented a huge percentage of that small number. The number is accurate in that instance, but it’s not exactly a straight on look at all pregnancies with 81% miscarriages. I fully believe miscarriages happened due to the jab, but not at this rate across the board.
81% miscarriage rate? That's not something that can be swept under the rug. Color me skeptical.
I’ve seen this stat for a couple years. I think it was a very small sampling and then over half of the women they were tracking just disappeared out of the study. The number they were left to analyze was now even smaller and the miscarriages, which did occur, represented a huge percentage of that small number. The number is accurate in that instance, but it’s not exactly a straight on look at all pregnancies with 81% miscarriages. I fully believe miscarriages happened due to the jab, but not at this rate across the board.
I wish he'd realize that using a flawed statistic hurts his case/credibility. And then again to people who share it.