Oh, I'm sorry! My mistake. Now that I know that since he isn't listed publicity as a child genius that means that he couldn't possibly ever be one. Thanks for the "community notes"
I dunno m’am, You provided nothing of value about Barron’s potential. It’s like me saying “I think so and so is a murderer” and then I send you the Wikipedia page of famous murderers. That’s not research, it’s reaching.
Do you even Q bro? Literally everything Q does has plausible deniability behind it.
Thats akin to saying well trump didn't ever publicly or directly confirm that Q was a military op so there is no proof its not just huge larp.
Go back to patriots.win already and while you're at it get a booster. Don't be a science denier dude.
Why don't you go do something useful prove that he is and impress everyone on here....or go back to pw and jerk to the latest low effort libtard hate meme like all the other trolls
Taking a quick glance at your comment history, annnnd thanks sweetheart, but I’m good. Never been to PW, and been here longer than you. Take your brain dead takes to conspiracies.win
Interesting interaction. A few things come to mind.
One, OP has made a rather limited contribution to GAW, if votes are anything to go by. Not that this necessarily pertains to the validity of PM's hypothesis, but it's something that is noticeable.
Two, my personal rubric for zeroing in on truth involves the triangulation of three separate axes: one, inspirational aka internal, via the heart and intuition, two, scripture, text, written (revealed) expressions of truth, and three, real world experience and evidence.
OP's reasoning seems to be missing a certain grounding in the third area. Op appears to have drawn certain conclusions based on looking at various data points but seems to be buying in heavily into belief as if fact.
Leaps of logic
i.e.
I dunno m’am, You provided nothing of value about Barron’s potential. It’s like me saying “I think so and so is a murderer” and then I send you the Wikipedia page of famous murderers. That’s not research, it’s reaching.
Response:
Thats akin to saying well trump didn't ever publicly or directly confirm that Q was a military op so there is no proof its not just huge larp.
This connection makes no sense to me.
There is plenty of proof that Q is not a larp, regardless of anything Trump has or has not said.
However, is there any tangible proof that Barron T is "Q"? Or is "the main person" in Q? Or that Barron is a genius? And has been since forever?
You are right to point out that OP failed to offer anything beyond stating that prodigies exist.
And then, OP got very snarky. Very.
But let's go full speculative here: Maybe PandaMoon17 is in fact Barron Trump! Maybe Op is attempting to reveal to the board who he really is! Maybe Op's insight is completely on point and pretty much everyone else is .... retarded.
There are some things out there that none of us can really ever know. There are stories within stories, ideas and worldviews, and what we choose to ingest and then use to formulate our beliefs is part of our own personal creativity. But the question is, how well do our beliefs match and align with reality? Can we even know what "reality" is? Ultimately, we have to make choices and then stand up for those choices, and be responsible for those choices. At some point, (in my view), reality will kick in and then it's crunch time.
OP obviously has certain beliefs and a certain interpretation of many of the datapoints that a lot of us have access to. I think it is noticeable, however, that a large majority of those who chose to engage with this post are not in agreement with Op's beliefs.
(Notably, despite the post being stickied, it didn't get even above 100 ups, which is a bit unusual.)
Oh, I'm sorry! My mistake. Now that I know that since he isn't listed publicity as a child genius that means that he couldn't possibly ever be one. Thanks for the "community notes"
....Come on people.
I dunno m’am, You provided nothing of value about Barron’s potential. It’s like me saying “I think so and so is a murderer” and then I send you the Wikipedia page of famous murderers. That’s not research, it’s reaching.
Do you even Q bro? Literally everything Q does has plausible deniability behind it.
Thats akin to saying well trump didn't ever publicly or directly confirm that Q was a military op so there is no proof its not just huge larp.
Go back to patriots.win already and while you're at it get a booster. Don't be a science denier dude.
Why don't you go do something useful prove that he is and impress everyone on here....or go back to pw and jerk to the latest low effort libtard hate meme like all the other trolls
Taking a quick glance at your comment history, annnnd thanks sweetheart, but I’m good. Never been to PW, and been here longer than you. Take your brain dead takes to conspiracies.win
Interesting interaction. A few things come to mind.
One, OP has made a rather limited contribution to GAW, if votes are anything to go by. Not that this necessarily pertains to the validity of PM's hypothesis, but it's something that is noticeable.
Two, my personal rubric for zeroing in on truth involves the triangulation of three separate axes: one, inspirational aka internal, via the heart and intuition, two, scripture, text, written (revealed) expressions of truth, and three, real world experience and evidence.
OP's reasoning seems to be missing a certain grounding in the third area. Op appears to have drawn certain conclusions based on looking at various data points but seems to be buying in heavily into belief as if fact.
Leaps of logic
i.e.
Response:
This connection makes no sense to me.
There is plenty of proof that Q is not a larp, regardless of anything Trump has or has not said.
However, is there any tangible proof that Barron T is "Q"? Or is "the main person" in Q? Or that Barron is a genius? And has been since forever?
You are right to point out that OP failed to offer anything beyond stating that prodigies exist.
And then, OP got very snarky. Very.
But let's go full speculative here: Maybe PandaMoon17 is in fact Barron Trump! Maybe Op is attempting to reveal to the board who he really is! Maybe Op's insight is completely on point and pretty much everyone else is .... retarded.
There are some things out there that none of us can really ever know. There are stories within stories, ideas and worldviews, and what we choose to ingest and then use to formulate our beliefs is part of our own personal creativity. But the question is, how well do our beliefs match and align with reality? Can we even know what "reality" is? Ultimately, we have to make choices and then stand up for those choices, and be responsible for those choices. At some point, (in my view), reality will kick in and then it's crunch time.
OP obviously has certain beliefs and a certain interpretation of many of the datapoints that a lot of us have access to. I think it is noticeable, however, that a large majority of those who chose to engage with this post are not in agreement with Op's beliefs.
(Notably, despite the post being stickied, it didn't get even above 100 ups, which is a bit unusual.)
u/PandaMoon17
Nice research! Thanks for looking up all the ebbidences and "contributing" your important deboonking of me.