Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think when you create a produce in the employ of a company, that all your product belongs to them. So they are free to do with you creative results as they please.
Ain't saying it's rights, but if you understand that going in to the deal, then that is the way it is. It's like someone in a subdivision wanting to sue over the housing board forcing them to take a flag down when the bylaws clearly say that you can't fly a flag in front of you house. You agreed to the deal up front. It's not right, but that's what you agreed to.
AI is going to put many, many people out of work. I read somewhere where there is no longer a market for song writers, especially things like jingles for advertisements because AI can do it in an instant. Poetry, who need a poet when AI can produce something better that the best poet in seconds. How about writing a news article? Nope, just give AI the facts, and it can write a perfect article. Maybe an author, well AI can write a book as good as any human, probably better. So maybe you think you make a living as a pharmacist, or doctor. Soon AI will be able to handle most of that better then humans.
That's not a small task. You are talking about rewriting the entire work for hire legal code. There honestly is no difference between allowing another human to take over your position, or an AI. The fact that an AI is better and faster at mimicry really doesn't change anything.
The company paid you for your time while you were working there. You have no rights to work product beyond that compensation. Trying to legislate anything else would be nearly impossible at this point. It would be akin to doing away with employer/employee relationships altogether.
Arguably not a bad thing, but I don't see it happening.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think when you create a produce in the employ of a company, that all your product belongs to them. So they are free to do with you creative results as they please.
Ain't saying it's rights, but if you understand that going in to the deal, then that is the way it is. It's like someone in a subdivision wanting to sue over the housing board forcing them to take a flag down when the bylaws clearly say that you can't fly a flag in front of you house. You agreed to the deal up front. It's not right, but that's what you agreed to.
AI is going to put many, many people out of work. I read somewhere where there is no longer a market for song writers, especially things like jingles for advertisements because AI can do it in an instant. Poetry, who need a poet when AI can produce something better that the best poet in seconds. How about writing a news article? Nope, just give AI the facts, and it can write a perfect article. Maybe an author, well AI can write a book as good as any human, probably better. So maybe you think you make a living as a pharmacist, or doctor. Soon AI will be able to handle most of that better then humans.
We are fucked, it what that spells out.
Then a provision should be made in the legal code to grant a creator the royalties to their creations if they're used to feed an AI
That's not a small task. You are talking about rewriting the entire work for hire legal code. There honestly is no difference between allowing another human to take over your position, or an AI. The fact that an AI is better and faster at mimicry really doesn't change anything.
The company paid you for your time while you were working there. You have no rights to work product beyond that compensation. Trying to legislate anything else would be nearly impossible at this point. It would be akin to doing away with employer/employee relationships altogether.
Arguably not a bad thing, but I don't see it happening.