https://x.com/ArynneWexler/status/1790859868426867050
These pro-Hamas demonstrations are not only linked to the usual suspects like George Soros, but they have ties to the Chinese Communist Party AND MILLIONS of $$$ have been funneled through the Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund to leftist NGOs supporting these Hamas encampments...
One-minute video on this about what the jews themselves claim:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TpYSHTRyMlbJ/
Agreed.
In our modern English versions, we see that the original words are translated differently. Not all the versions use the same English words. So, which is correct?
John 8:41, King James Version --
John 8:41, Young's Literal Translation --
The Expanded Bible is useful because it often gives more than one version of the various English translations.
John 8:41, Expanded Bible --
This tells me that various translators over the centuries had different understandings of how "porneia" should be translated into English in John 8:41.
I notice that all of these definitions that you state are very VAGUE.
"illicit." What does that mean EXACTLY?
"Marital unfaithfulness." What does that mean EXACTLY?
"Idolatry." What does that mean EXACTLY?
Regarding illicit, that is a general, vague term, that has no specific meaning.
Regarding marital unfaithfulness, I assume you mean adultery.
Whatever the words mean, they would have to be consistent between the OT and the NT. They cannot be different because the story and The Law did not change. The NT merely added more information.
Matthew 13:35, KJV --
Same verse, but Expanded Bible --
In the OT, the English "adultery" was translated from the Hebrew "naaph." Naaph means "Woman who breaks wedlock."
Notice, it is not "man" or "person" who breaks wedlock, but "woman."
In John 8:37, Jesus agrees with these Edomite jews that they were the SEED of Abraham. So, he was in their genetic family tree (just not decended from Jacob).
Jesus then said that although He knew they were of the seed of Abraham, nevertheless, Abraham was NOT their FATHER.
Are you saying that their response to Jesus was about who their MOTHER was -- that their mother had sex with someone who was not Abraham, or something similar in their family tree?
That would mean that they were NOT the seed of Abraham, but Jesus already acknowledged that they were. So, that can't be it.
There is no mention of anything about their mother, so we cannot conclude that adultery is what was referenced here.
The translation from "porneia" to "adultery" is wrong, and your claim that "fornication" means "adultery" in this passage cannot be correct.
The concept of "idolatry" gets closer to the truth.
When we think of the word "father" we can think of (a) genetic father, grandfather, great grandfather, etc., or (b) go ALL the way back to "the Father," as in the very beginning.
God was the Father of the Israelites, while Abraham was the first in the genetic line who received a special covenant from God.
The Edomite jews in John 8:41 are claming to be of Abraham because they knew that Abraham was in the direct genetic line going all the way back to God/Adam.
But in John 8:44, Jesus tells them:
He told them, yes their seed is through Abraham's family tree, BUT their Father is Satan.
He was a murderer FROM THE BEGINNING.
Who was the first murderer all the way back to the beginning?
Cain.
Cain was the seed of Satan, the serpent in the Garden of Eden.
Eve did not eat an apple. That is the washed and cleansed (and falsified) version we are told today.
Eve was seduced by the Serpent/Satan and their offspring was Cain, the murderer from the beginning.
Cain was expelled from the Garden of Eden and went off to find a woman to marry and other people to build a city.
Where did those people come from?
They could not have been from Adam. They had to be adults who were already living at that time.
Adam had a genetic family tree, one branch of which can be traced down to Abraham, via Seth. His grandson, Jacob, was the original patriarch of the Israelite branch of this family tree.
The Edomites were of Esau, who race mixed with Canaanites (of the cursed Caanan, grandson of Noah, who was also a direct descendent of Adam). Both Noah and Abraham were loved by God. But both Canaan and Esau/Edom were hated.
Their family trees had mixed with the Kenites, who were the descendents of Cain, who was the seed of Satan, represented by the Serpent in the Garden of Eden, and all those other people were created by the Fallen Angels, that we do not learn about until Revelation 12:7-12.
There is MISSING INFORMATION in the OT, and some FALSE TRANSLATIONS throughout.
But read the OT/NT in context with each other, and go back to the original meanings in the scripture, and the story starts to come together and make sense.
What does God tell the Israelite people to do? One thing was to remain "holy." Holy means to be SEPARATE from the others.
Jude 1:7, KJV --
Jude 1:7, EXB --
What is this "strange flesh" or "different flesh" that are described as "fornication" that is something that "God does not allow?"
In Genesis 1, a phrase is repeated, "kind after kind." That applied to animals and plants, and it would also apply to those who God created, and not who the Fallen Angels created by their corruption.
The concept of race mixing being a sexual sin has been removed from the Bible via (a) false translations and (b) modern changes in definitions to words.
Examples: "Gay" meant happy, but modern definitions include homosexuality (a specified sin in the Bible); and "Adultery" meant woman who breaks wedlock, but modern definitions include male or female who "cheats."
But these modern definitions are irrelevant because the Bible does not change with the times. The original scriptures in their original languages tells us just how much the modern pastors are lying about what the Bible really says, and what the story is really about.
Deuteronomy 23:2, KJV --
But what does "bastard" mean here?
Same verse, but EXB --
What is a "forbidden marriage?"
Something forbidden by God, right?
It might include incest, certainly, but it also included those who did not keep to the "holy" dictate of "kind after kind."
Their offspring would be "bastards," because their parents were of different races, not "kind after kind," and therefore not according to God's Law.
It is the bastard who cannot enter the assembly of God. Why, if not because he is the result of breaking God's law?
What law, if not race mixing?
Adultery? How would you know?
Idolatry? How would you know?
Unmarried sex? How would you know?
Race mixing? You KNOW because you can SEE it with your own two eyes.
And you can STILL see the result 10 generations later.
Like it or not, it is the only explanation that makes sense.
In John 8:41, Jesus was saying that, while these Edomite jews did have Abraham in their ancestry, and therefore God, they ALSO had Satan in their ancestry, which makes them MIXED, and due to their satanic blood, they would do what their Father, Satan, would have them do.
I know it is hard to get an understanding of this perspective, but we have been lied to about everything else, why not the Bible, where most people turn to for morality and perspective, as well?
This perspective also explains why jews were kicked out of 100+ countries over 1,000+ times (mostly White European) over many centuries, and why it is jews (not all, but most who are involved are jews) who are behind the destruction we see in Western White Christian society tody -- foreign invasion of non-Whites, destruction of our wealth via central banking, promotion of degeneracy, control of the media, control of aspects of government, among many others.
You are close, but not quite there.
They CLAIM to be Hebrews/Israelites/Judahites.
But they are not.
Their false claim does not make them "fake jews."
It makes them "fake Judahites," "fake Israelites," and "fake Hebrews," who are real jews and are real LYING jews -- some of them don't know that they are promoting a lie; others do.
"Jew" was not in the Greek or Latin languages. It was a made-up English word when the Bible was being translated into English, and used to describe those fake Judahites that Jesus was dealing with in the Roman province of Judea.
They WERE Judeans, for sure, just like illegal alien Mexicans and Venezuelans who are currently living in Texas could be called "Texans," but they are not the REAL Texans. They are invaders.
Same concept, more or less.