First of all, no German ever referred to themselves as "Nazis." This was an insult coined by a jewish propagandist.

The term "Nazi" began to be widely used in the early 1930s, shortly after the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) came to power in Germany. The term was initially used by political opponents of the party as a way to mock its members and their ideology. However, it eventually became widely adopted as a shorthand for the party and its ideology, both by its opponents and supporters. By the mid-1930s, the term was in common use in both English and German, which pre-dates the publication of this book by enough of a margin for me to discard this point.

Secondly, during this period, fascism was not the evil associated with that form of government today. Following the destruction and ashes of Weimar, fascism was the most efficient method to restore Germany, and this form of government was supported by its populace.

In 1942, the popularity of fascism continued to decline in many countries, particularly as the tide of the war began to turn against the Axis powers. The military failures of fascist regimes such as Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, combined with the atrocities committed by these regimes, contributed to a growing sense of disillusionment among the general population. Additionally, the propaganda efforts of the Allied powers, which portrayed fascist regimes as oppressive and tyrannical, further contributed to the decline in popularity of fascism. By 1942, many people had come to view fascism as an inherently flawed and dangerous form of government. Furthermore, one must also consider that Nazi Germany was not the target audience for this book, so the author's opposition to what they still viewed as a good form of government is not at all surprising.

I found while reading through this document, that much of what was claimed against Hitler was innuendo, just because he used similar language of groups previous to his rise to power. You can't make such a leap in logic to then conclude that he must have had help or influence from these groups just because some words he used in Mein Kampf were similar.

Correct, those findings are circumstantial. Add to your brain-folder, there may come a time you run across further evidence. There is much to be declassified.

I can tell you that Hitler did have the support from the pope and the Vatican during this time, but probably more because the Vatican wanted to align itself with what it perceived as the "winning side" at the time, and someone that matched their core values. The Vatican didn't want to lose either infrastructure or the revenue from parishioners. We can see this in the included quote from Bishop Hudal on page 33.

Quite a striking statement! (I have already moved way beyond the "probably more because" speculative checkpoint, but that's fine) again I only present these things for people to consider. I've basically come to my conclusions though, and as I refine them, or forsake them, I'll adjust my speech accordingly in the future.

Thank you for the discussion! I'd love to continue if you are willing. I am going to read the things you posted and get back to you on them.

I will admit to not studying all the source material cited in the document. It does seem to condemn the Jesuits as a "Trojan Horse" infecting Catholicism, and this much is true. The jewish influence in the Jesuits is well-known: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctt1w8h1xm But again, I caution that this document is clever propaganda. From page 43: "The crusades of the Middle Ages also began with persecution of the Jews..." The old, "feel sorry for me" trick. Jews were persecuted, yes, but only because of their refusal to assimilate into other cultures/nations, but also because of ritual child sacrifice, usury, and other anti-social behavior. (And yes, I can provide documentation of all this as well.)

The Jesuits are not some blight upon Rome, no matter what deception they put out to create that distance. Mystery Babylon loves its Jesuits, and anybody else willing to give their life for the Babylonian causes.

As to Jews engaged in Babylonian Mystery Religious practices such as human sacrifice I don't dispute it---I simply include them within the Babylonian framework, which is headquartered in Rome and has been since before Christ came, though at the time it was a pagan system appearing as such. Today it has "the appearance of a lamb" (Christ). These people will use literally anything to further the agenda, including their own fellow-satanists to justify them taking more power (referring to your remark about the crusades and Babylonian Talmudic Jews)