One thing I've learned while exhaustively researching everything about WWI, The Treaty of Versailles, the Weimar Republic, WWII, Hitler, etc., etc., is that one must be extremely vigilant about recognizing the authors of the content. This document was written by an individual named Lehmann. I can tell you with statistical relevance that more times than not, anything written about this period by jews varies between out-and-out propaganda, to something that appears legitimate, but is written in such a way to draw you in with facts, but then cleverly disguising falsehoods.

You have clues to this when you read over and over, "Nazi-Fascism" in this composition. First of all, no German ever referred to themselves as "Nazis." This was an insult coined by a jewish propagandist. Secondly, during this period, fascism was not the evil associated with that form of government today. Following the destruction and ashes of Weimar, fascism was the most efficient method to restore Germany, and this form of government was supported by its populace.

I found while reading through this document, that much of what was claimed against Hitler was innuendo, just because he used similar language of groups previous to his rise to power. You can't make such a leap in logic to then conclude that he must have had help or influence from these groups just because some words he used in Mein Kampf were similar.

I can tell you that Hitler did have the support from the pope and the Vatican during this time, but probably more because the Vatican wanted to align itself with what it perceived as the "winning side" at the time, and someone that matched their core values. The Vatican didn't want to lose either infrastructure or the revenue from parishioners. We can see this in the included quote from Bishop Hudal on page 33.

I will admit to not studying all the source material cited in the document. It does seem to condemn the Jesuits as a "Trojan Horse" infecting Catholicism, and this much is true. The jewish influence in the Jesuits is well-known: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctt1w8h1xm

But again, I caution that this document is clever propaganda. From page 43: "The crusades of the Middle Ages also began with persecution of the Jews..." The old, "feel sorry for me" trick. Jews were persecuted, yes, but only because of their refusal to assimilate into other cultures/nations, but also because of ritual child sacrifice, usury, and other anti-social behavior. (And yes, I can provide documentation of all this as well.)

Yes, Hitler did arrest some priests (pg. 44), but this was because they were communist sympathizers. This was also the reason why the Vatican tried to align itself with Hitler, to try to get on his good side.

I could continue to comment bit-by-bit about this document, but my comment is already getting long. I find it helpful to examine history, especially of this time period, by practical measures. What is frequently missed by historical reckoning is that Hitler was not only loved by Germans, but also the peoples of the surrounding nations. If he was truly evil, and aligned with evil forces affecting the Catholic church, he would not have had the support of religious people all across Europe. They recognized what he was fighting against, and represented the only force standing in the way of the bolsheviks and communism. Just because some of his words are similar to those of right-wing religious figures such as Martin Luther, doesn't necessarily condemn him of being a puppet of the elites.

There are several recognized efforts by jews to shake the support of Hitler, most notably, the "his father was an illegitimate Rothschild baby" lie. We must be vigilant to see through these claims, and examine what is written about him and this time period with understanding of the tenuous grip jews have on history. If they lose control of this one, foundational lie, the whole thing comes tumbling down.