If my memory is correct the Dems, at different times, held Bill Barr, Wilbur Ross, Dan Scavino, and Mark Meadows in contempt of Congress. The DOJ refused to indict them and enforce the Congressional Contempt charges. The Dems, to my memory, did not even suggest arresting them and holding them.
This is a scenario where I think Kash is suggesting ineffective tactics. Forcing a Constitutional crisis where SCOTUS may likely rule against Congress and in favor for f the Executive Branch would help the Dems. It is far better to try this in the Court of Public Opinion where people clearly see the double standard.
If SCOTUS cites a technicality that favors the Biden Administration it would undermine the argument we have a two-tiered Justice System.
This is definitely a case where optics wins the day.
If my memory is correct the Dems, at different times, held Bill Barr, Wilbur Ross, Dan Scavino, and Mark Meadows in contempt of Congress. The DOJ refused to indict them and enforce the Congressional Contempt charges. The Dems, to my memory, did not even suggest arresting them and holding them.
This is a scenario where I think Kash is suggesting ineffective tactics. Forcing a Constitutional crisis where SCOTUS may likely rule against Congress and in favor for f the Executive Branch would help the Dems. It is far better to try this in the Court of Public Opinion where people clearly see the double standard.
If SCOTUS cites a technicality that favors the Biden Administration it would undermine the argument we have a two-tiered Justice System.
This is definitely a case where optics wins the day.
Amen, thank you for sharing this.
Well said, and that goes for most things currently going on, in addition to this Garland issue.
The speaker of the house has to order the sarge at arms to make the arrest
Pelosi isn't going to have anyone arrested as then-speaker