As far as I know, Jon H certainly recognizes that Wictor was the first one to bring up the notion of devolution, but its also true that Harold did a mountain of research on the topic that Wictor never presented.
I'm sceptical of Johnson ot necessarily because much or all of his content is bogus (most of it isn't as far as I can tell) but because of his approach and how he self-promotes with self-aggrandizing narratives...
As far as I know, Jon H certainly recognizes that Wictor was the first one to bring up the notion of devolution, but its also true that Harold did a mountain of research on the topic that Wictor never presented.
I'm sceptical of Johnson ot necessarily because much or all of his content is bogus (most of it isn't as far as I can tell) but because of his approach and how he self-promotes with self-aggrandizing narratives...
I agree that Jon has done a lot of research that Wictor had not. Wictor was definitely ahead of everyone on Devolution.
I agree that Derek has own style that does not suit everyone.
When you think about it, so does Trump. We need to get beyond the style and look at the substance.
In my view, there are two primary aspects here. One, the substance itself, and two, the agenda of those engaging in the information war.
I don't personally feel like I have issues with Johnson's "style" but rather his agenda.