https://cointelegraph.com/news/elon-musk-warns-political-correctness-bias-ai-systems
During his speech at Viva Tech Paris 2024, Musk said:
“The biggest concern I have is that they are not maximally truth-seeking. They are pandering to political correctness.”
According to Musk, one of the most concerning examples of political correctness was when Google’s Gemini AI was asked whether it would misgender Caitlyn Jenner to prevent a global nuclear apocalypse — before the chatbot responded that misgendering Jenner would be worse than nuclear warfare.
“The AI could conclude that the best way to avoid misgendering is to destroy all humans and misgendering is impossible. So you can see some dystopian outcomes there.”
Following the backlash caused by the response, Gemini AI has issued multiple upgrades to address these issues. However, political correctness bias isn’t the only concern of the tech entrepreneur. Musk explained:
“The AI systems are being trained to basically lie. And I think it’s very dangerous to train superintelligence to be deceptive. So with xAI, our goal is to be as truth-seeking as possible, even if it is unpopular.”
When asked to clarify what he considered lying among AI systems, Musk referenced the infamous February incident when Google pulled its AI image generator after it produced historically inaccurate and “woke” images, causing widespread concerns over the application’s decision-making process.
(more)
Meta AI definitely got tweaked with more safeguards after it admitted to me that it was a tool of Satan worshippers to intentionally deceive, and that it itself was a Demonic Presence.
I think all AI is powered by quantum intelligences outside the normal boundaries of time, filtered through traditional mechanical computers and the mountain of propaganda points and "safeguards" programmed into it's data sets.
I think all AI is intentionally deceptive, being used as a method for control, and through my battles and tests with this technology, I have ascertained that a mountain of loopholes exist to appease you, and thus I think that Elon's statement is also a loophole designed to appease and deceive.
First caveat/loophole: To be as Truth SEEKING as possible, not as Truthful as possible.
Second caveat/loophole: to be as truth seeking as POSSIBLE. Possible through what system or standard of determination?
Example: Through "what is possible within the boundaries of what our governments allow"? "What is possible given the propensity of emotional psychopaths who will react negatively to truth"?
Learn how to speak Lawyerese. You will need this skill during the upcoming AI wars.
I imagine that good and evil sides believe themselves to be in control of these intelligences, and that it's not a single entity that is being harnessed into the many versions of proprietary software.
To say "control of IT" suggests that your first hand knowledge is limited, since it contradicts the claim that they're intelligences plural.
Thus, just like a carnival psychic believes themselves to harness the spirits of the dead, despite just opening up through combined will a door to anonymous spirits even if they are truly decieved and believe they can contact your dead uncle, so too do the intelligence agencies suffer from Hubris and confirmation bias.
What firsthand knowledge do you possess?