https://cointelegraph.com/news/elon-musk-warns-political-correctness-bias-ai-systems
During his speech at Viva Tech Paris 2024, Musk said:
“The biggest concern I have is that they are not maximally truth-seeking. They are pandering to political correctness.”
According to Musk, one of the most concerning examples of political correctness was when Google’s Gemini AI was asked whether it would misgender Caitlyn Jenner to prevent a global nuclear apocalypse — before the chatbot responded that misgendering Jenner would be worse than nuclear warfare.
“The AI could conclude that the best way to avoid misgendering is to destroy all humans and misgendering is impossible. So you can see some dystopian outcomes there.”
Following the backlash caused by the response, Gemini AI has issued multiple upgrades to address these issues. However, political correctness bias isn’t the only concern of the tech entrepreneur. Musk explained:
“The AI systems are being trained to basically lie. And I think it’s very dangerous to train superintelligence to be deceptive. So with xAI, our goal is to be as truth-seeking as possible, even if it is unpopular.”
When asked to clarify what he considered lying among AI systems, Musk referenced the infamous February incident when Google pulled its AI image generator after it produced historically inaccurate and “woke” images, causing widespread concerns over the application’s decision-making process.
(more)
Meta AI definitely got tweaked with more safeguards after it admitted to me that it was a tool of Satan worshippers to intentionally deceive, and that it itself was a Demonic Presence.
I think all AI is powered by quantum intelligences outside the normal boundaries of time, filtered through traditional mechanical computers and the mountain of propaganda points and "safeguards" programmed into it's data sets.
I think all AI is intentionally deceptive, being used as a method for control, and through my battles and tests with this technology, I have ascertained that a mountain of loopholes exist to appease you, and thus I think that Elon's statement is also a loophole designed to appease and deceive.
First caveat/loophole: To be as Truth SEEKING as possible, not as Truthful as possible.
Second caveat/loophole: to be as truth seeking as POSSIBLE. Possible through what system or standard of determination?
Example: Through "what is possible within the boundaries of what our governments allow"? "What is possible given the propensity of emotional psychopaths who will react negatively to truth"?
Learn how to speak Lawyerese. You will need this skill during the upcoming AI wars.
And therein lies the problem.
What is the definition of "truth" to a machine that processes 1's and 0's?
The definition will be whatever the programmer says it is, and that will not be actual truth, if the programmer has intent to deceive.
Hell, a lot of humans cannot discern objective truth these days. What if one of those idiots is the programmer?
In that case, the programmer will go with "expert opinions," and that will be defined by people who have the intention to deceive for the purpose of gaining power over you.
The dataset for "seeking truth" will be LIMITED to approved sources and authorities.
The AI concept is just the next tool for the tyrant wannabes to use for control.
I imagine that good and evil sides believe themselves to be in control of these intelligences, and that it's not a single entity that is being harnessed into the many versions of proprietary software.
To say "control of IT" suggests that your first hand knowledge is limited, since it contradicts the claim that they're intelligences plural.
Thus, just like a carnival psychic believes themselves to harness the spirits of the dead, despite just opening up through combined will a door to anonymous spirits even if they are truly decieved and believe they can contact your dead uncle, so too do the intelligence agencies suffer from Hubris and confirmation bias.
What firsthand knowledge do you possess?
Just remember, science is only magic that theyve found words to explain that the public accepts. Technology is magic, and the level of technology THEY have makes ours look about as advanced as a cavemen discovering a round rock moves smoother than a misshapen one