Typical contrails are condensation, cold air meeting a hot engine. The same process occurs when you walk into a warm room wearing a pair of glasses after standing in freezing temperatures, your glasses fog up. Condensation.
At altitudes of 50,000 feet, it is -50 degrees and humidity is extremely low. The condensation behind the plane freezes and creates the white trail however, with the humidity being so low, the tiny ice crystals disappear very fast through a process called sublimation. Solid turning to a gas.
If you leave an ice cube in your freezer long enough it will get smaller until it is gone, solid to gas process is sublimation. This is standard physics, and no amount of conjecture can change the laws of physics. It there are persistent lines from an aircraft traveling at 50,000 altitude, there is a solid substance present.
I did and you said it's wrong haha. Persistent contrails and Non-Persistent contrails. The old fashioned kind almost always dissipated at a distance you could see behind the plane therefore they were Non-Persistent contrails. I asked my mom about it when I was a kid. Why are there those white marker lines that disappear going behind the jets sometimes?
Okay, now we are getting somewhere concrete. Roughly when (what decade) do you think these nefarious trails that dont evaporate within seconds first started showing up?
I'm trying to let you know I understand persistent trails have been around since before the jet age. Notice I said the old fashion kind Almost always were non-persistent. There is an old nasa study that spells it out that persistent trails are rarer than non-persistent. All I am saying is after 1998 Persistent trails became ubiquitous. They went from see em once in a great while, not every day, not every week to see them every day, all day by the dozens if not hundreds. While Non-persistent trails did not go up much by the way.
Notice I said the old fashion kind Almost always were non-persistent.
See, this is thee kind of word games people play with themselves to make themselves believe whatever they want.
I already showed you, in that 3 min clip, bunch of books where they had captured what you would call "chemtrails" as far back as 50s and even documented short and long lingering contrails. None of them mention anything about how rare one is compared to another.
So if they existed then (even if its very rare according to you), then its not a "different kind of trail" but the same trail in different atmospheric conditions. This is following your own logic.
If you want to claim causation beyond atmospheric condition, then the onus is on you to provide some evidence beyond "I remember the times when they were not this frequent".
If this is the sole reason for believing in "chemtrails" then that belief does not belong here and you can take it to conspiracies.win.
If you claim there are two different kinds of contrails, go ahead and tell me which is which.
Typical contrails are condensation, cold air meeting a hot engine. The same process occurs when you walk into a warm room wearing a pair of glasses after standing in freezing temperatures, your glasses fog up. Condensation.
At altitudes of 50,000 feet, it is -50 degrees and humidity is extremely low. The condensation behind the plane freezes and creates the white trail however, with the humidity being so low, the tiny ice crystals disappear very fast through a process called sublimation. Solid turning to a gas.
If you leave an ice cube in your freezer long enough it will get smaller until it is gone, solid to gas process is sublimation. This is standard physics, and no amount of conjecture can change the laws of physics. It there are persistent lines from an aircraft traveling at 50,000 altitude, there is a solid substance present.
I did and you said it's wrong haha. Persistent contrails and Non-Persistent contrails. The old fashioned kind almost always dissipated at a distance you could see behind the plane therefore they were Non-Persistent contrails. I asked my mom about it when I was a kid. Why are there those white marker lines that disappear going behind the jets sometimes?
Okay, now we are getting somewhere concrete. Roughly when (what decade) do you think these nefarious trails that dont evaporate within seconds first started showing up?
I'm trying to let you know I understand persistent trails have been around since before the jet age. Notice I said the old fashion kind Almost always were non-persistent. There is an old nasa study that spells it out that persistent trails are rarer than non-persistent. All I am saying is after 1998 Persistent trails became ubiquitous. They went from see em once in a great while, not every day, not every week to see them every day, all day by the dozens if not hundreds. While Non-persistent trails did not go up much by the way.
See, this is thee kind of word games people play with themselves to make themselves believe whatever they want.
I already showed you, in that 3 min clip, bunch of books where they had captured what you would call "chemtrails" as far back as 50s and even documented short and long lingering contrails. None of them mention anything about how rare one is compared to another.
So if they existed then (even if its very rare according to you), then its not a "different kind of trail" but the same trail in different atmospheric conditions. This is following your own logic.
If you want to claim causation beyond atmospheric condition, then the onus is on you to provide some evidence beyond "I remember the times when they were not this frequent".
If this is the sole reason for believing in "chemtrails" then that belief does not belong here and you can take it to conspiracies.win.