Either side can trace the radio signal, find the number station and destroy it. Or just sit waiting at the numbers station and arrest whoever comes to use it. I'm not sure how number stations work, even if they are unmanned, the signal/message has to originate somewhere and they could trace the source. Hillary isn't going to be able to stay below the radar if she has a number station in her backyard.
Q has confirmed that comms like this exist, remember when Obama did the RED charity comms saying "Meet me in Seoul"
Obama also doing comms in the Jimmy Kimmel vid. He says "Big Red" instead of santa. And jokes about handing over the alien files, As Q said Obama was shopping for a new handler, so probably meant he was advertising to hand over his own blackmail files to a new puppet master or something
What number station are you destroying? How do you know that is the one that your enemies are actually using? It's hard to locate something that broadcasts on a timetable you don't know and can move anywhere within your hemisphere between broadcasts. The fact that number stations continue to broadcast suggests they aren't being destroyed.
that number stations continue to broadcast suggests they aren't being destroyed.
How do you know those ones are being used by the deepstate?
The location of radio signals can easily be triangulated with our current tech, let alone the advanced tech Q/NSA have, Then they can just aim one of their satellites at it to see where it is and if anyone is nearby who set it up. However I'll concede comms through tv shows and media events like i'm claiming have a similar problem where the NSA knows who the writers are that do the comms, and therefore knows they're a blackmailed puppet. The deepstate just thought that no one noticed these types of comms and didn't realize Q has been around for decades at the top of military intelligence knowing how they operate.
Also I meant to add in my previous comment, Q did mention about Nellie Ohr trying to use HAM radio, so I do partially concede your point. The deepstate probably do use number stations aswell, but my main claim is that number stations are quite vulnerable, and doing comms through media and events like this chase bank explosion is a lot more efficient and secure, and the message goes world wide instantly, but number stations have a limited range, good luck sending a number stations message from America half way around the world to Soros without the NSA being Sus about it. (Do tell me if I am misunderstanding how number stations work, If it's a mesh network where number stations automatically rebroadcast the message they receive to more number stations, then I'm wrong, and that would be quite a good method)
Have you heard of Decoding Symbolism? He does great digs of comms in movies, TV & news events. I don't agree with all of it, some of the stuff I don't understand and seems a bit of a stretch, but most of it is fascinating and plausible. Check out this one about Nuclear events in the news preceding both Epstein & Hugh Hefner's death.
Q doing their own comms and Q proofs in this manner also teach us how the deepstate comms work.
I have no idea who is using numbers stations or why. But consider:
wouldn't you rather have a communications method where you enemy cannot figure out if you're actually communicating a message or not? If you communicate via blown up buildings or derailed trains you've picked a trigger absolutely everyone is going to notice. If you choose to communicate via a numbers station that has been reading a changing series of numbers everyday for years your enemies have no idea if today's message is telling anyone to do something or if it's just useless crap.
wouldn't you rather have a communications method that can convey everything you need to know rather than being limited to just what you've prearranged a certain Chase branch exploding is supposed to mean?
wouldn't you rather have a communications method that is 100% intentional instead of something that could accidentally trigger a message you didn't intend (what if HVAC technicians working after hours on the building's furnaces accidentally damaged a gas line and that caused the explosion later once the gas built up enough)?
wouldn't you rather have a communications system that didn't require you to have to physically dispatch goons somewhere TO BLOW UP A BUILDING to communicate something? There are cameras all over and more being added daily. When something explodes people are going to be checking that looking for a reason
HAM radio can reach thousands of miles.
it doesn't have to be HAM radio. It could be VLF or ELF transmitters like we use to communicate with nuclear subs. it could be satellite based. it could be Craigslist ads.
You don't send the encrypted message to anyone, you broadcast it on a numbers station.
Either side can trace the radio signal, find the number station and destroy it. Or just sit waiting at the numbers station and arrest whoever comes to use it. I'm not sure how number stations work, even if they are unmanned, the signal/message has to originate somewhere and they could trace the source. Hillary isn't going to be able to stay below the radar if she has a number station in her backyard.
Q has confirmed that comms like this exist, remember when Obama did the RED charity comms saying "Meet me in Seoul"
https://qalerts.app/?n=254
https://qalerts.app/?n=262
Obama also doing comms in the Jimmy Kimmel vid. He says "Big Red" instead of santa. And jokes about handing over the alien files, As Q said Obama was shopping for a new handler, so probably meant he was advertising to hand over his own blackmail files to a new puppet master or something
https://youtu.be/eoqYd39wkZs
What number station are you destroying? How do you know that is the one that your enemies are actually using? It's hard to locate something that broadcasts on a timetable you don't know and can move anywhere within your hemisphere between broadcasts. The fact that number stations continue to broadcast suggests they aren't being destroyed.
How do you know those ones are being used by the deepstate?
The location of radio signals can easily be triangulated with our current tech, let alone the advanced tech Q/NSA have, Then they can just aim one of their satellites at it to see where it is and if anyone is nearby who set it up. However I'll concede comms through tv shows and media events like i'm claiming have a similar problem where the NSA knows who the writers are that do the comms, and therefore knows they're a blackmailed puppet. The deepstate just thought that no one noticed these types of comms and didn't realize Q has been around for decades at the top of military intelligence knowing how they operate.
Also I meant to add in my previous comment, Q did mention about Nellie Ohr trying to use HAM radio, so I do partially concede your point. The deepstate probably do use number stations aswell, but my main claim is that number stations are quite vulnerable, and doing comms through media and events like this chase bank explosion is a lot more efficient and secure, and the message goes world wide instantly, but number stations have a limited range, good luck sending a number stations message from America half way around the world to Soros without the NSA being Sus about it. (Do tell me if I am misunderstanding how number stations work, If it's a mesh network where number stations automatically rebroadcast the message they receive to more number stations, then I'm wrong, and that would be quite a good method)
Have you heard of Decoding Symbolism? He does great digs of comms in movies, TV & news events. I don't agree with all of it, some of the stuff I don't understand and seems a bit of a stretch, but most of it is fascinating and plausible. Check out this one about Nuclear events in the news preceding both Epstein & Hugh Hefner's death.
Q doing their own comms and Q proofs in this manner also teach us how the deepstate comms work.
I have no idea who is using numbers stations or why. But consider:
wouldn't you rather have a communications method where you enemy cannot figure out if you're actually communicating a message or not? If you communicate via blown up buildings or derailed trains you've picked a trigger absolutely everyone is going to notice. If you choose to communicate via a numbers station that has been reading a changing series of numbers everyday for years your enemies have no idea if today's message is telling anyone to do something or if it's just useless crap.
wouldn't you rather have a communications method that can convey everything you need to know rather than being limited to just what you've prearranged a certain Chase branch exploding is supposed to mean?
wouldn't you rather have a communications method that is 100% intentional instead of something that could accidentally trigger a message you didn't intend (what if HVAC technicians working after hours on the building's furnaces accidentally damaged a gas line and that caused the explosion later once the gas built up enough)?
wouldn't you rather have a communications system that didn't require you to have to physically dispatch goons somewhere TO BLOW UP A BUILDING to communicate something? There are cameras all over and more being added daily. When something explodes people are going to be checking that looking for a reason
HAM radio can reach thousands of miles.
it doesn't have to be HAM radio. It could be VLF or ELF transmitters like we use to communicate with nuclear subs. it could be satellite based. it could be Craigslist ads.