I couldnt' figure out why election fraud was mentioned in a stormy daniels hush money case much older than 2020. DA bragg argued the hush money was election fraud in 2016 because the revelation could have altered the 2016 election, and so it was a cover up.
This argument has now established precedent for another Trump supportive DA to bring a case against Hunter Biden and the 51 ex-intelligence officers who false-testified that the Biden laptop was 'Russian disinformation' which absolutely would have swayed the election since we have exit polls showing exactly that it would have. Therefore, covering up the hunter laptop story was willful attempt to sway the election--which it did--in 2020; The judicial precedent of this Trump case is going to be used against Hunter.
This happens via Stare Decisis and judicia Precedent
In the American legal system, stare decisis, or the doctrine of precedent, holds that courts should follow established precedents in similar cases.
Braggs case is unique and if it stands they've basically decimated the law and will make it so Rs that grow a pair can do this back to democrats.
They should start now though.
THEY SHOULD START NOW THOUGH.
They don't know what they are talking about
Of course, but it goes to your point about precedence.