No, we can't put it behind us, No we can't work with the Democrats, They arn't really Democrats.
(www.americanthinker.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
The author gives a very accurate description of what the democrat party is, and what they do, and why they are so loathsome, and dangerous. But, I disagree with his conclusion about how to stop them by "never" voting for a democrat.
That is precisely what the weakling, traitorous, worse than useless neo-con/RINO "republicans" want the public to do- "never vote democrat," leaving ...guess who... to get our vote by default.
Conservatives have been voting against democrats, and their marxist agenda for decades yet, here we are. Our conservative voting strategy has failed us, our nation, and our society for decades.
...And that is precisely why voting for a democrat (the nastier, and more unhinged the better) is better than voting for installing a RINO just because they wear a "republican party" name tag. We can count on the democrats to lawlessly attack, and destroy "republicans" with any chance they are given.
If the republican party leadership cannot produce loyal conservative candidates who will staunchly oppose the insidious marxist-democrat agenda that is leading our nation to ruin, then we are better off electing democrats who will destroy such a party of worthless, traitorous weaklings.
In ancient Roman times, this [counter-intuitive] course of action would be akin to something called "decimation." We the people can apply a figurative form of that decimation principle to the "republican" party as well, by simply removing cowardly "republicans" from our ranks, (by voting them out) and allowing the democrats to do what they want to do- destroy the "republican" party.
If the "republican" party fails to elevate Donald J. Trump [back] to the position as the rightful president of the USA for any reason whatsoever, then the punishment for that failure will fall to we the people.
ALWAYS REMEMBER: It only takes around -2% - 3% of conservative voters to actively vote against a RINO by voting for whichever candidate is most likely to beat them in an election, protest voting, to swing an election 4-6% points. That vote swing, is large enough to remove nearly every RINO in the nation from power. The voting public has this power.
Sure, democrats gaining more power than the weakling "republican" capitulation party already gives them will suck but, not for long. One or two election cycles of democrat regime rule will undoubtedly produce the kind of public outrage, and backlash that will produce conservative fighters in large enough numbers to actually end, and reverse the marxist-democrat agenda.
We are not stopping the fall of America by simply "voting republican." History has taught us that. Conservative voters need stronger, and more determined fighters, not more polished turds wearing an (R) Party name tag.
I think differently.
As it stands we have two primaries. Most states only allow you to vote in one or the other. So no matter what the cabal gets two chances to put a puppet on the ballot, and we know from experience many times there are two puppets and we are left to vote for what we perceive to be the less evil.
Any third party option is in reality just throwing away your vote, because all the money and all the support is going to the two from the established puppet parties.
If we had only one party the primary would be in effect the actual vote, but if the one chosen is not someone the voters want the door is open for an independent challenger to have a legitimate chance of taking out the chosen puppet. With one party running the people can actually focus on those running and not be constantly pitted against the other side while they miss focusing on the toady their side is trying to push.
This is the way the founding fathers envisioned our system working. They never intended a two party system. The two party system has led to a thoroughly corrupted Congress with a clouded view of how things are getting done, and very few willing to expose the stinky dealings of the inner politics that go on.