I say faith is belief in that which has no evidence. Predicting experimental outcomes better than other theories would tend to indicate there is evidence to support a theory.
But no one needs confidence in something to factually state a theory is the most accurate model we know of. There would be evidence. This is getting retarded.
Predicting experimental outcomes better than other theories would tend to indicate there is evidence to support a theory.
Evidence that is often later proven corrupted/misinterpreted/poorly tested/poor control groups ect. One might say you have Faith in your evidence until you don't.
Everything you said is wrong.
"...and FAITH toward what you think may be true. (until you are proven wrong)"
Too bad you can't express why. Are you Mr. Fauci ?
How is what I said an expression of faith by scientists? Define faith.
I say faith is belief in that which has no evidence. Predicting experimental outcomes better than other theories would tend to indicate there is evidence to support a theory.
Professionals (word Scientists) say:
Faith : a high degree of trust or confidence in something
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/faith
Faith : something that is believed especially with strong conviction
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith
But no one needs confidence in something to factually state a theory is the most accurate model we know of. There would be evidence. This is getting retarded.
Evidence that is often later proven corrupted/misinterpreted/poorly tested/poor control groups ect. One might say you have Faith in your evidence until you don't.
You can say that all you want. I disagree. A lot of people have faith in incorrect scientific theories but that's not the scientific method.