54% of children are suffering from a chronic illness
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
But how much of this is just better testing? I knew kids growing up who definitely had developmental delays, but they didn't get any help and were never diagnosed. They were just punished by their parents for not doing better. I also knew kids who, now looking back, clearly had allergies, which is why they didn't like certain foods. It's not like these suddenly appeared out of nowhere, half the kids I grew up with weren't even vaccinated.
Nope, it is the vaccines.
This is why they refuse to do long term studies on children vaccinated vs placebo.
Look no further than the Amish population.
Dude, the Amish have special needs children as well. Not vaccinating has not seemed to prevent any of that.
Dr McCullough has recently come out stating the Amish don't have the percentages of sick kids as the standard American populace does
The Amish is not a good example to use for the general population. Since they intermarry amongst themselves they suffer from something called the Founder Effect. Whatever genetic issues their ancestors had are usually passed on at a higher rate than the general population, especially those that are recessive traits, because both parents would likely be carrying the recessive genes, due to having the same ancestors.
These are some diseases that the Amish have a higher chance of having than the general population:
Tay-Sachs disease, glutaric aciduria, type 1, and maple syrup urine disease, Angelman syndrome, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), Amish cerebral palsy, and cri-du-chat syndrome.
Couple this with other obvious differences like diet (the much lower consumption of artificial and processed foods especially), more exercise, lower exposure to carcinogens from tobacco use, etc... and it should be obvious that vaccination rate alone can't be responsible for the lower rates of Autism.
This isn't an argument that vaccines aren't related to Autism rates, just pointing out that this is not a strong argument to use for that purpose, especially when trying to convince normies.
Maybe not kids getting the flu, but they definitely have kids with things like autism and down syndrome.
With better detection should come a better cure rate. Reducing these numbers.
You'd need a cure for a better cure rate, though.
That should come with earlier detection. Its much easier to treat early rather than late.
Cancer survivability have improved a lot with early detection.
What is the cure for either autism or allergies?
Treatment and cure are two separate things. And treatment and cures come after diagnosis, so obviously they wouldn't decrease the numbers of cases being detected.
Sort of like your discussion re allergies.... I think kids naturally know what's good or bad for them.
We did a food elimination with my kids when younger to check what was causing certain behaviours.
Eg I have one kid who never liked chocolate or fruit like bananas and slow cooked meat. All high in amines.
The other child had issues with salicylates...eg summer fruits / berries / watermelon.
The problem is the older generations think if it's "healthy" it's "healthy"
We are all made different