A) Q posted "Boom, Boom, Boom, Boom..." drop (which at the time many anons recognized as textually depicting a handgun upside-down) on June 3. Hunter's "gun" trial starts June 3.
6 year delta (June 3 2018 - June 3 2024)
B) On June 12, Q posts drop 1464 that includes a snapshot image of the June 3 post. The image name is 6_11.png. Hunters guilty verdict is issued on Tuesday June 11 (6/11)
The question is, what does this mean?
For example, aside from the above, do the contents of these drops correlate to the current situation in any other way?
1440
The 4 "boom, boom, boom, boom"s were thought at the time to indicate 4 x booms in that week. This week?
Aside from the Hunter verdict, is this (so far) a "week to remember"?
Dark to Light is so generic, it easily pertains to the Great Awakening and great exposure in general.
Blackout necessary? How is this related?
1464
No. 100?
Dark to Light (already discussed)
1:07 [Marker] ???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A838gS8nwas is the White House video about the Trump / Kim summit in Singapore. 1:07 in the video marks the dialog that says "out of the darkness comes the light", which seems to connect with 'dark to light'.
Do you believe in coincidences? - this much more powerfully connects to the correlation between the WH video dialog "out of the darkness comes the light" and the Q operation in general "dark to light".
Conclusions
Argument:
So far, it seems that there is no major significant connection between the actual Q drops and the current situation, EXCEPT that the numerical connections do line up in terms of dates. If there is a message here, it would seem that the message is simply:
Things are happening according to plan. The White Hats are still active, and things are more controlled than appears. Nod. Wink. Stay with us, anons.
Personally, I do not think that the Hunter trial was planned back in 2018, so that the coincidence would line up 6 years later. Rather, there were important contents in the Q drops during 2017-2021, and because they now stand as markers, the 'Team' can possibly shape some of the events that later unfold (i.e. hunters trial) so that they reaffirm the message: "patriots in control, things are proceeding, have faith, trust, and stay with us anons."
Counterargument:
But the mind has to ask: would the Team prearrange the trial date for hunter and ALSO the conviction and the date of the conviction? It would mean secretly and possibly illegally controlling the judge, the jury, etc.
If the US needs to get back to law and order and accountability, can this be done by manipulating the system in the manner that the Cabal deep state has been doing for decades?
IMO, it is tantalizing to observe these connections, but critical thinking requires considering purpose, method, and other factors (How? Why?) If there is a purposeful (i.e. intentionally created connection) one is obliged to ask what that purpose is and what objectives it serves.
At this juncture, I do not need confirmations or hints or winks to reinforce my convictions re" the Q operation or the White hats. I wonder, do others?
The point should not to be to find ANY connections, but to find meaningful connections, and then find the meaning. That requires self-critical thinking and removal or at least acknowledgment of bias.
Yes, this is the obvious question. What if, for example, Hunter plead guilty years back, and Joe Biden himself plead guilty years back and both are going through the motions as part of the deal. In other words, strings by the Cabal cut, new strings (aka lawful and legal ones) applied from the White Hats?
I cannot help thinking about Dog Day and NoName, and how that was [apparently] set up for optical appearances but the reality was something else.
So, I'd keep my mind open that possibly something else was at play (although I doubt very much that charges against Hunter involved the gun charges. These are probably the very LEAST of any charges that could be brought against Hunter.
So if there were other charges and trials, it still would not necessary make the gun trial a show trial.
Rational thought says to me that the numbers here are coincidence, but reasonable doubt means I have to keep an open mind to the possibility that there is a lot I don't know.
That said, I prefer to take on the position of reasoned and rational acceptance of Q etc rather than the position of 'true believer' where I'll accept things because they speak to my emotions, rather than a solid, critical thinking perspective. In my view, there is PLENTY in the Q drops etc, where critical thinking actually accepts the total validity of the Q operation and Q+ without needing to adopt belief positions.
Doubting that the numbers here are somehow significant ( 6:3 6:11 + Gun text ) is NOT equivalent to doubting the Q operation. Just the opposite. Doubting the Q operation is the irrational choice, but questioning such things as the 'coincidences' here is not. IMO.
What is the significance of the connections?
What's being said here?
A breakdown:
A) Q posted "Boom, Boom, Boom, Boom..." drop (which at the time many anons recognized as textually depicting a handgun upside-down) on June 3. Hunter's "gun" trial starts June 3.
6 year delta (June 3 2018 - June 3 2024)
B) On June 12, Q posts drop 1464 that includes a snapshot image of the June 3 post. The image name is 6_11.png. Hunters guilty verdict is issued on Tuesday June 11 (6/11)
The question is, what does this mean?
For example, aside from the above, do the contents of these drops correlate to the current situation in any other way?
1440
The 4 "boom, boom, boom, boom"s were thought at the time to indicate 4 x booms in that week. This week?
Aside from the Hunter verdict, is this (so far) a "week to remember"?
Dark to Light is so generic, it easily pertains to the Great Awakening and great exposure in general.
Blackout necessary? How is this related?
1464
No. 100?
Dark to Light (already discussed)
1:07 [Marker] ???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A838gS8nwas is the White House video about the Trump / Kim summit in Singapore. 1:07 in the video marks the dialog that says "out of the darkness comes the light", which seems to connect with 'dark to light'.
Do you believe in coincidences? - this much more powerfully connects to the correlation between the WH video dialog "out of the darkness comes the light" and the Q operation in general "dark to light".
Conclusions
Argument:
So far, it seems that there is no major significant connection between the actual Q drops and the current situation, EXCEPT that the numerical connections do line up in terms of dates. If there is a message here, it would seem that the message is simply:
Things are happening according to plan. The White Hats are still active, and things are more controlled than appears. Nod. Wink. Stay with us, anons.
Personally, I do not think that the Hunter trial was planned back in 2018, so that the coincidence would line up 6 years later. Rather, there were important contents in the Q drops during 2017-2021, and because they now stand as markers, the 'Team' can possibly shape some of the events that later unfold (i.e. hunters trial) so that they reaffirm the message: "patriots in control, things are proceeding, have faith, trust, and stay with us anons."
Counterargument:
But the mind has to ask: would the Team prearrange the trial date for hunter and ALSO the conviction and the date of the conviction? It would mean secretly and possibly illegally controlling the judge, the jury, etc.
If the US needs to get back to law and order and accountability, can this be done by manipulating the system in the manner that the Cabal deep state has been doing for decades?
IMO, it is tantalizing to observe these connections, but critical thinking requires considering purpose, method, and other factors (How? Why?) If there is a purposeful (i.e. intentionally created connection) one is obliged to ask what that purpose is and what objectives it serves.
At this juncture, I do not need confirmations or hints or winks to reinforce my convictions re" the Q operation or the White hats. I wonder, do others?
The point should not to be to find ANY connections, but to find meaningful connections, and then find the meaning. That requires self-critical thinking and removal or at least acknowledgment of bias.
Hmmmm.....
u/#silvia
Great post. I enjoyed the counterargument!
One thing I'd add for
Perhaps it was a show trial, and his real trial happened in secrecy outside civilian courts?
Is it illegal to put on a show trial? I'm not sure on that one.
Thanks for the feedback. MUCH appreciated!
Yes, this is the obvious question. What if, for example, Hunter plead guilty years back, and Joe Biden himself plead guilty years back and both are going through the motions as part of the deal. In other words, strings by the Cabal cut, new strings (aka lawful and legal ones) applied from the White Hats?
I cannot help thinking about Dog Day and NoName, and how that was [apparently] set up for optical appearances but the reality was something else.
So, I'd keep my mind open that possibly something else was at play (although I doubt very much that charges against Hunter involved the gun charges. These are probably the very LEAST of any charges that could be brought against Hunter.
So if there were other charges and trials, it still would not necessary make the gun trial a show trial.
Rational thought says to me that the numbers here are coincidence, but reasonable doubt means I have to keep an open mind to the possibility that there is a lot I don't know.
That said, I prefer to take on the position of reasoned and rational acceptance of Q etc rather than the position of 'true believer' where I'll accept things because they speak to my emotions, rather than a solid, critical thinking perspective. In my view, there is PLENTY in the Q drops etc, where critical thinking actually accepts the total validity of the Q operation and Q+ without needing to adopt belief positions.
Doubting that the numbers here are somehow significant ( 6:3 6:11 + Gun text ) is NOT equivalent to doubting the Q operation. Just the opposite. Doubting the Q operation is the irrational choice, but questioning such things as the 'coincidences' here is not. IMO.