No, I meant a government site where they have a link to the declassified page. Otherwise when we post this on twitter, they would simply claim its fake.
And, if you don't think the above suits you and all the rest I gave you, then check out these other X postings of the doc I found after doing a reverse image search:
Well, I'm sorry to have offended you with my 'newly' adjective. I thought it was new. The place that I came across it said it was new and I didn't recognize seeing it before.
I put some effort into the post and searched up all the links. I cleaned up the image so it was legible. I did the best I could with what I had found. But you don't talk about what's in it, but instead you'd rather insult the OP. You sound like a jerk.
And also, I see your profile says you are new on this board. 125 days! Not a good start to making friends. However, you've garnered 25,000 likes with only 1 post that got 83 votes and some comments...
How to explain this? You have obviously changed your user name, and are likely this one: JG5 ( u/JosephGoebbels5 ). Am I right?
Need to find a direct link to a government site that contains this document.
Here you go:
https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-document-preempt-volume-1-no-ess-hr00118s0017-ecohealth-alliance.pdf
Rejection of DEFUSE Project Proposal by DARPA
https://files.catbox.moe/i8sy7v.pdf
DEFUSE Executive Summary
https://files.catbox.moe/aux0jz.pdf
Broad Agency Announcement PREventing EMerging Pathogenic Threats(PREEMPT)
https://files.catbox.moe/jj3fqd.pdf
No, I meant a government site where they have a link to the declassified page. Otherwise when we post this on twitter, they would simply claim its fake.
Here is the 24-page PROJECT VERITAS obtained report that includes that one page which is on page 2:
https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/2mVob3c1aDd8CNvVnyei6n/95af7dbfd2958d4c2b8494048b4889b5/JAG_Docs_pt1_Og_WATERMARK_OVER_Redacted.pdf
And, if you don't think the above suits you and all the rest I gave you, then check out these other X postings of the doc I found after doing a reverse image search:
This would be the official page: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/military-documents-about-gain-of-function-contradict-fauci-testimony-under
The link to the doc is under that page.
Thanks fren.
I hear you, if you can't find the sauce then it is fake to the rest of the world.
Sauce-sauce- source or gtfo.
Here is the sauce
The document named US Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy's Analysis Report to Inspector General of DOD and internal Marine Corps email, second page.
Read the damn 24-page report I linked above. Or, GTFO.
BTW, this is not newly declassified. It was posted on Veritas page in 2022.
Well, I'm sorry to have offended you with my 'newly' adjective. I thought it was new. The place that I came across it said it was new and I didn't recognize seeing it before.
I put some effort into the post and searched up all the links. I cleaned up the image so it was legible. I did the best I could with what I had found. But you don't talk about what's in it, but instead you'd rather insult the OP. You sound like a jerk.
And also, I see your profile says you are new on this board. 125 days! Not a good start to making friends. However, you've garnered 25,000 likes with only 1 post that got 83 votes and some comments...
How to explain this? You have obviously changed your user name, and are likely this one: JG5 ( u/JosephGoebbels5 ). Am I right?
Needs to be from a .Gov site.
I found the document on project veritas site as part of FOIA declass.
So all someone has to do next is to dig into their dockets and find the docs on the docket.