No, I meant a government site where they have a link to the declassified page. Otherwise when we post this on twitter, they would simply claim its fake.
And, if you don't think the above suits you and all the rest I gave you, then check out these other X postings of the doc I found after doing a reverse image search:
No one here is doubting your source. We're just visualizing our brainwashed normie friends and family who will dismiss this important info because it clashes with their normie programming.
You will need A LOT more than a link from "ctfassets.net" to prove (a) this document is real, and (b) the contents of the document are real, if you want anyone to think this is credible.
The claim in the document is they were working on a bat virus vaccine, but it "got loose" and spread disease.
PROVE IT.
There is NO LABORATORY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD that has ANY SARS-Cov-2 vaccine.
IT DOES NOT EXIST.
Vaccines, in general, have NEVER BEEN PROVEN TO BE EFFECTIVE in reducing illness.
I have no doubt that Fauci and his co-conspirators were scheming how to make vaccines more "functional," which is most likely what "gain of function research" is. And I have no doubt they were doing it outside the legal structure of the USA, likely in Wuhan, China, among other places.
BUT ...
This mystery document DOES NOT PROVE anything.
Where is the virus? Let's start there.
Don't bother, though, because more than 100 government agencies, universities and laboratories all around the world have stated IN WRITING that they do not have any and do not know of any lab that does.
Well, I'm sorry to have offended you with my 'newly' adjective. I thought it was new. The place that I came across it said it was new and I didn't recognize seeing it before.
I put some effort into the post and searched up all the links. I cleaned up the image so it was legible. I did the best I could with what I had found. But you don't talk about what's in it, but instead you'd rather insult the OP. You sound like a jerk.
And also, I see your profile says you are new on this board. 125 days! Not a good start to making friends. However, you've garnered 25,000 likes with only 1 post that got 83 votes and some comments...
How to explain this? You have obviously changed your user name, and are likely this one: JG5 ( u/JosephGoebbels5 ). Am I right?
Here you go:
https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-document-preempt-volume-1-no-ess-hr00118s0017-ecohealth-alliance.pdf
Rejection of DEFUSE Project Proposal by DARPA
https://files.catbox.moe/i8sy7v.pdf
DEFUSE Executive Summary
https://files.catbox.moe/aux0jz.pdf
Broad Agency Announcement PREventing EMerging Pathogenic Threats(PREEMPT)
https://files.catbox.moe/jj3fqd.pdf
No, I meant a government site where they have a link to the declassified page. Otherwise when we post this on twitter, they would simply claim its fake.
Here is the 24-page PROJECT VERITAS obtained report that includes that one page which is on page 2:
https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/2mVob3c1aDd8CNvVnyei6n/95af7dbfd2958d4c2b8494048b4889b5/JAG_Docs_pt1_Og_WATERMARK_OVER_Redacted.pdf
And, if you don't think the above suits you and all the rest I gave you, then check out these other X postings of the doc I found after doing a reverse image search:
This would be the official page: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/military-documents-about-gain-of-function-contradict-fauci-testimony-under
The link to the doc is under that page.
VIDEO for normies!!!! DOWNLOAD:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z0XUWqS1eNsE/
download, share
Thanks fren.
I hear you, if you can't find the sauce then it is fake to the rest of the world.
Sauce-sauce- source or gtfo.
Here is the sauce
The document named US Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy's Analysis Report to Inspector General of DOD and internal Marine Corps email, second page.
Thank you, but I was just agreeing with you when you were asking for the source and the sauce given was lack luster at best.
Now, smoking guns have been posted. Good for you for pushing the issue until unquestionable truth was presented in the thread.
Read the damn 24-page report I linked above. Or, GTFO.
too much. Understand that this is a research board. If you post, you have to be prepared to be asked for the sauce.
No one here is doubting your source. We're just visualizing our brainwashed normie friends and family who will dismiss this important info because it clashes with their normie programming.
It is a limited hangout.
DARPA is the agency that created Facebook.
You will need A LOT more than a link from "ctfassets.net" to prove (a) this document is real, and (b) the contents of the document are real, if you want anyone to think this is credible.
The claim in the document is they were working on a bat virus vaccine, but it "got loose" and spread disease.
PROVE IT.
There is NO LABORATORY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD that has ANY SARS-Cov-2 vaccine.
IT DOES NOT EXIST.
Vaccines, in general, have NEVER BEEN PROVEN TO BE EFFECTIVE in reducing illness.
I have no doubt that Fauci and his co-conspirators were scheming how to make vaccines more "functional," which is most likely what "gain of function research" is. And I have no doubt they were doing it outside the legal structure of the USA, likely in Wuhan, China, among other places.
BUT ...
This mystery document DOES NOT PROVE anything.
Where is the virus? Let's start there.
Don't bother, though, because more than 100 government agencies, universities and laboratories all around the world have stated IN WRITING that they do not have any and do not know of any lab that does.
DARPA is run by spooks.
Don't forget that.
BTW, this is not newly declassified. It was posted on Veritas page in 2022.
Well, I'm sorry to have offended you with my 'newly' adjective. I thought it was new. The place that I came across it said it was new and I didn't recognize seeing it before.
I put some effort into the post and searched up all the links. I cleaned up the image so it was legible. I did the best I could with what I had found. But you don't talk about what's in it, but instead you'd rather insult the OP. You sound like a jerk.
And also, I see your profile says you are new on this board. 125 days! Not a good start to making friends. However, you've garnered 25,000 likes with only 1 post that got 83 votes and some comments...
How to explain this? You have obviously changed your user name, and are likely this one: JG5 ( u/JosephGoebbels5 ). Am I right?
Wrong. Stop ping spamming me with your paranoia.