The only people who will be detonating nukes or any kind of false flag will be the same globohomo cabal spooks and kooks who have declared undeclared war against the citizens of the world via false flags since forever - assuming it is even possible to make and set off nuclear bombs because if you spend enough time down the “nukes don’t exist” rabbit hole, you may have second thoughts…
There is a subtle difference between an atom bomb and a nuclear bomb. A dive down the rabbit hole suggests that fast nuclear fission, as purportedly used in an atom bomb, is not possible, but slow nuclear fission, as used in a nuclear reactor is possible.
A nuclear bomb that's built using a traditional explosive core with a uranium or plutonium payload is still easily possible. In fact, given the performance of DU ammo, I suspect that 'tactical nukes' are in fact state-of-the-art nuclear bombs. Trad core surrounded by finely milled uranium, which is directed by the explosion and has a radiation footprint. Easily sold to the man in the street as a nuclear bomb. This is what a limited nuclear war will look like.
The fission process used in atom / nuclear bombs (no distinction in terminology) and reactors is the same process. In the bomb, the reaction is allowed to proceed in chain fashion with neutrons multiplying at each fission event in a runaway process. In the reactor, the neutrons are "moderated" to prevent a chain runaway, by absorbing them and changing their energy (temperature). Almost no uranium or plutonium is left over from a nuclear detonation (but there are fission products).
I am not convinced Andrew Bridgen is our friend.
For some good context on him from an excellent UK writer, I recommend reading this - including the links she uses and the notes/comments on the article: https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p/a-bridgen-way-too-far?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
The only people who will be detonating nukes or any kind of false flag will be the same globohomo cabal spooks and kooks who have declared undeclared war against the citizens of the world via false flags since forever - assuming it is even possible to make and set off nuclear bombs because if you spend enough time down the “nukes don’t exist” rabbit hole, you may have second thoughts…
There is a subtle difference between an atom bomb and a nuclear bomb. A dive down the rabbit hole suggests that fast nuclear fission, as purportedly used in an atom bomb, is not possible, but slow nuclear fission, as used in a nuclear reactor is possible.
A nuclear bomb that's built using a traditional explosive core with a uranium or plutonium payload is still easily possible. In fact, given the performance of DU ammo, I suspect that 'tactical nukes' are in fact state-of-the-art nuclear bombs. Trad core surrounded by finely milled uranium, which is directed by the explosion and has a radiation footprint. Easily sold to the man in the street as a nuclear bomb. This is what a limited nuclear war will look like.
The fission process used in atom / nuclear bombs (no distinction in terminology) and reactors is the same process. In the bomb, the reaction is allowed to proceed in chain fashion with neutrons multiplying at each fission event in a runaway process. In the reactor, the neutrons are "moderated" to prevent a chain runaway, by absorbing them and changing their energy (temperature). Almost no uranium or plutonium is left over from a nuclear detonation (but there are fission products).