I heard that same question back in H.S. from some of my favorite teachers, who wouldn't talk past that question. This was in the early '60's. Now it got ADL ed.
Is this why some people are now choosing to be called They & Them? It's sounds so powerful being one of they and them. Is it cheating to vote twice if you're Plural?
I’m more of the belief that “they” and “them” have always been the words daemons called themselves, dating back to the Bible.
THEY are becoming more open in their open admission of full conversion to satanism.
Introducing those words to talk about sex is just another connection to their deity.
You don’t have to believe it, it might not be true, but if you look at everything as simply a normalization everything regarding fallen angels (or whatever those were/are) may be true the actions seem interesting.
Again you and I don’t have to believe it, the question is, do they and/or their followers believe it and their actions support it (knowingly or unknowingly).
What if the main Q statement isn’t about Q? How many coincidences do we need to see before we admit it’s not a coincidence? What if that is about THEM and how they act, and what they do and seeing them for who they are.
I heard that same question back in H.S. from some of my favorite teachers, who wouldn't talk past that question. This was in the early '60's. Now it got ADL ed.
Is this why some people are now choosing to be called They & Them? It's sounds so powerful being one of they and them. Is it cheating to vote twice if you're Plural?
… what if our penchant of calling them “they” and “them” is one of the reasons they started this pronoun crap - to hide and obfuscate even from that.
I’m more of the belief that “they” and “them” have always been the words daemons called themselves, dating back to the Bible.
THEY are becoming more open in their open admission of full conversion to satanism.
Introducing those words to talk about sex is just another connection to their deity.
You don’t have to believe it, it might not be true, but if you look at everything as simply a normalization everything regarding fallen angels (or whatever those were/are) may be true the actions seem interesting.
Again you and I don’t have to believe it, the question is, do they and/or their followers believe it and their actions support it (knowingly or unknowingly).
What if the main Q statement isn’t about Q? How many coincidences do we need to see before we admit it’s not a coincidence? What if that is about THEM and how they act, and what they do and seeing them for who they are.
Have had that same thought. Potentially an option of what’s going on.
We do fundamentally know where the evil comes from.