so again.. are we also outlawing artillery, cruise missiles, UAVs, etc? is a sniper rifle too unfair?
ridiculous line of reasoning. keeping your troops safe is a priority. if the task can be done just as well, or better, without endangering the lives of your men, you obviously take that opportunity.
ok. so are bullets. what exactly is the difference?
When you fire a rifle at an enemy, you are on the ground and subject to all the dangers as is your enemy.
You are not safe in a building many miles away behind a computer screen directing a machine to take out human beings.
so again.. are we also outlawing artillery, cruise missiles, UAVs, etc? is a sniper rifle too unfair?
ridiculous line of reasoning. keeping your troops safe is a priority. if the task can be done just as well, or better, without endangering the lives of your men, you obviously take that opportunity.
The question I responded to was: what is the difference.