Tulsi Gabbard talking about some Democrats wanting to stop Trump’s secret service detail- putting him in danger. She’s doing her part to wake people up
(youtube.com)
🫡 THE GREAT AWAKENING 🔆
Um, yeah, um no.
I guess it depends on what you define as 'entire', but if you are saying that people CANNOT wake up, it just don't happen, then I would submit to you the evidence of 2020 and 2021, not to mention.... oh, The Great Awakening.
I don't think it's wrong to be skeptical, but to say that people cannot change or wake up is a self-defeating proposition, imo.
Good point. Trump was a Democrat for decades, ffs. Obviously people can change.
Democrats as a whole were not always the insane, psychopathic and corrupt Marxists / globalists that now define the party as a whole. Sure, no party has ever been purely for the People or uncorrupt, but what we have today is a historical aberration, imo.
Ok.
Trump never really changed. Hell, he’s still a 1985 democrat but the party left him and radicalized his following…
Trump had none of the ideas tulsi had. Trump wasn't a WEF groomed politician tulsi is. Big Flippin difference. She can watch from the sidelines and change whoever mind will listen to her.
What comment is this rant based on?
I find there is a difference between an influencer/politician changing course versus a regular everyday citizen.
Highly skeptical of a politician changing course completely. Especially one who was a member of the WEF to boot.
I applaud skepticism. Just be aware of and take in to account your own biases.
I don't know that she was ever a 'member' of the WEF. If you dig into the connections, I think you'll find out more about what the WEF themselves have been doing and how they have been attempting to recruit people, and that the connections are not always what they seem or even what they are presented as.
FYI, I've working in the sphere of some high-level international NGOs and I know from experience that a name association is not always evidence of actual collusion and/or corruption.
But like I say, I appreciate the skepticism. Sure, a regular person changing course and a public person changing course require different levels of attention, but .... well..... St Paul of Tarsus, right?
I guess I think that Gabbard, despite being on the left, is helping the cause in certain ways. I'm more interested in her impact than on a personal judgment or her quality as a person (outside my jurisdiction!)
Change or not. She has the ability to play a role. I just don't think it should be in government.
Fair call. For me, in terms of this post, I cannot help but consider the people who might listen to her (who would be in her target audience) who would have to go, "oh, really? Hmmmm.... That's a good point".
If she was stupid enough to ever hold those positions she can't be trusted. Plentybof people who never got tricked to pick from.
What do you mean pick from? Who is picking Gabbard? For what?
She's a factor, whether small or whatever, on the political and social stage. Whether you like her or not is irrelevant from the viewpoint of what impact she has and how.