TLDR: The Narrative that Mike Pompeo is Evil because he tried to or wanted to assassinate Julian Assange started from extremely dubious origins. Researching the origins of the narrative raises some important questions.

Earlier this year, Tucker Carlson came out and stated that "Mike Pompeo tried to have Julian Assange Killed. It's a known fact".

It appears that since then, some people have simply swallowed the narrative whole, gobbling it down without any critical thinking or without any independent research.

Independent research. It's what anons should be specializing in, right? IMO, one is NOT anon simply if one follows or is familiar with Q, or simply if one believes in the Q operation and "the Plan". To be truly anon means to adopt the methods Q exhorted anons to:

Unity is Strength. Unity is Love. Unity is Humanity. Trust yourself. Think for yourself. (Q4462)

Knowledge is power. Think for yourself. Trust yourself. Do due diligence. (Q3662)

Think for yourself. Research for yourself. Trust yourself. (Q3683)

Exclude emotion and personal desire, instead use logic and critical thinking based on situational awareness (Q2381)

Amplification By the Mainstream Media

Anyway, when I heard the statement by Tucker, I felt more than sceptical. After all, Q reinforced their endorsement of Mike Pompeo multiple times. E.g.

u/#q950

See also: Q1122 (Trust Kansas), Q2979,

More importantly, Mike Pompeo worked with DJT to accomplish a lot of work. He was put in place by Trump, worked with Trump. Is it reasonable to think that on one hand, Trump is a 5D chess genius BUT also he put Deep State people in his most important cabinet positions?

Anyway, after listening to Just Human on Defected (https://rumble.com/playlists/Hdp1AQdJ7JI), I decided to dig on the story itself. Here is what I found:

The narrative that Pompeo at the CIA was "investigating ways" (not even actually trying, but just "looking at possibilities") starts from some extremely dodgy, deep state and Anti-Trump authors. It was taken up and promulgated by the Deep State propaganda apparatus, including The Guardian, Reuters, The Independent, etc., and since then, it has been kept alive and given new energy this year in particular.

Here is what the Guardian said:

Mike Pompeo and officials requested ‘options’ for killing Assange following WikiLeaks’ publication of CIA hacking tools, report says

Senior CIA officials during the Trump administration discussed abducting and even assassinating WikiLeaks founder, according to a US report citing former officials.

The discussions on kidnapping or killing Assange took place in 2017, Yahoo News reported..... Mike Pompeo, and his top officials were furious about WikiLeaks’ publication of “Vault 7”.....

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/sep/27/senior-cia-officials-trump-discussed-assassinating-julian-assange

So, just here, let's pause. Knowing Q, do you really think that the Trump Administration was "furious about WikiLeaks’ publication of “Vault 7”? Anons know that according to Q, Assange has been under White Hat protection while the Wikileaks organization itself was taken over by deep state Clowns In Action. Q1849, Q1595

Who would have the most interest in smearing Trump, Pompeo and the Trump Administration? Everyone knows that Assange has been the darling of the left, because he represented such an attack on the Establishment. But it was also Assange who declare that he (they, wikileaks) didn't publish any dirt on Trump because "there isn't any".

Given what we know about Seth Rich, Assange, Trump and Q, is there ANY reason to really suspect that DJT or anyone part of his team would want to get rid of Assange?

So, then, what does this story represent? Nothing more than a deployment intended to paint Trump with the smear of 'dirty CIA' (which the Left will use when convenient,. Remember, divide and conquer. The Left have their useful evil enemies (i.e. CIA) and the Right have their useful evil enemies (i.e. Marxists).

But how to smear Trump? By painting Mike Pompeo as an evil CIA director working at Trump's behest, or driven by the obvious corrupt CIA elements. Typically, the 'report' cites officials, former officials, etc, ALL ANONYMOUS...

Think about that.

The Origins of the Narrative

So where, then, did the 'report' actually originate? Yahoo News:

It is true that a report published by Yahoo News in 2021 claimed that, based on the accounts of former unnamed U.S. officials, there had been discussions considering killing Assange, with "senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration" even requesting "sketches" or "options" on how to kill him.

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-cia-want-julian-assange-killed-1917171

"former unnamed U.S. officials" speaking to leftist propaganda anti-Trump 'journalists'? Really?

Where did the narrative start?

Sources speaking to Yahoo News called the plans "unhinged and ridiculous," and it was unclear how serious they were, one saying, "It was just Trump being Trump." Trump denied the claim.

(ibid)

Here's where it started

Yahoo News: "Kidnapping, assassination and a London shoot-out: Inside the CIA's secret war plans against WikiLeaks" by Zach Dorfman, Sean D. Naylor and Michael Isikoff

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kidnapping-assassination-and-a-london-shoot-out-inside-the-ci-as-secret-war-plans-against-wiki-leaks-090057786.html

So who are these authors?

Zach Dorfman

https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/people/zach-dorfman

His work has appeared in Politico, The Atlantic, Atavist Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, Foreign Affairs, and The Nation, among other publications.

Sean D Naylor

https://www.yahoo.com/author/sean-naylor/

Michael Isikoff

https://www.yahoo.com/author/michael-isikoff/

https://www.hachette.com.au/michael-isikoff-david-corn/russian-roulette-the-inside-story-of-putins-war-on-america-and-the-election-of-donald-trump

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump

The incredible, harrowing account of how American democracy was hacked by Moscow as part of a covert operation to influence the U.S. election and help Donald Trump gain the presidency.

This is where it started.

So the question is, is this a legitimate reveal of plans and efforts by evil Mike Pompeo and/or evil Donald Trump to murder Julian Assange? Or is it a smear operation intended to divide and conquer?

Is it an important red-pill truth being revealed by establishment mainstream journalists, or a deployment by anti-Trumpers to add more propaganda showing Orange Man Bad, or for Trump Supporters, to sow seeds of doubt and distrust of Mike Pompeo, who was Trump's right hand man in so many critical international initiatives during 2018 - 2020?

Also, did Trump aka Q+ assign evil Mike Pompeo to the CIA as one of the very first aspects of his Administration (January 2017) as soon as he got in to the White House because ... well, Trump knew the CIA was corrupt and knew that they were deeply involved in the Russia Hoax amongst other things, so, "yeah, what the heck, I should assign an evil Deep State player like Mike Pompeo to the CIA for the first year"?

Or does it make more sense that Trump put Pompeo there to make changes and clean up certain key core sectors in the CIA to disable them and advance the Agenda of the Plan, and that the reports of 'discussions' from anonymous sources are bogus and fabricated?

I think anyone with a solid understanding of Q and Q+, and what has been going on the past 7 years, the answer is pretty obvious. But maybe that's just me.

Tucker Carlson

I like Tucker and I think he is playing a really interesting role in reaching out to a LOT of the middle-stream America and world, with information that they have been unaware of. In other words, Tucker is helping in the work of making the Great Awakening go mainstream.

But his blanket anti-Pompeo statements, promoting what seems obvious to me to be a deep state narrative planted by deep state operatives and promulgated by deep state propaganda organs, make no sense. So I remind myself that no one is perfect, and no one knows everything, and that everyone has their own biases and prejudices.

Personally, I find

the story that Pompeo (Kansas) is trusted deeply by Trump and the White Hats, that he was given a mission to execute at the CIA (which I assume he accomplished, as part of the overall plan), that after that mission he worked very closely with DJT at DJT's state Department to accomplish key diplomatic and other objectives, that after 2021 any strange stuff between Trump and Pompeo are partly kayfabe, that the White Hats have been protecting Assange UNTIL now and that Assange is now being set free as part of an overall plan (timing)

much more credible than

the narrative that Trump was dumb in trusting Pompeo, or that he for some reason put an evil actor in charge of the CIA as one of the first acts of his administration (for some unexplained and unfathomable reason, or to 'expose' evil Pompeo for a whole year and three months ), that Q lied or gave us disinfo when saying "Trust kansas", that somehow Trump managed to accomplish his international objectives even while using a deep state evil Secretary of State (again, for some weird reason, because not only are patriots NOT in control, but even DJT is NOT in control, and in fact has to do whatever the Cabal tells him to? /sarc), and that the CIA wanted to murder Assange but for some reason decided not to, and that three MSM propaganda merchants, including one who wrote a big book about the "harrowing story" of how Putin, Russia interfered with the 2016 election in order to get Trump elected", are disclosing the real truth about either Trump OR Mike Pompeo.

But maybe there is more information here? Did you find OTHER facts that make the second scenario more credible? if you did, put them in the comment section. After all, its really about independent research, thinking for yourself, and not just accepting something because Tucker or Joe Rogan or anyone else said so. Right?

Side Comment

It's natural for anyone who is awake to develop a deep thirst for some form of justice. We all desire it. And, given how long this operation has been going on and all the tensions, disappointments, re-orientations and patience it has required, its understandable that at various points in time, we desire a sense of relief.

Finding someone to hate, despise, and lay obvious blame to, can be cathartic in some cases and can sometimes offer emotional release. But this can also be a vulnerability that disinfo agents and psyop deployments by the Cabal can exploit.

To me, one of the best guards against being manipulated is doing one's own research to check and vet the information that one comes across, and to self-reflect, consider what emotions the information brings up, and to then apply critical thinking while putting the emotions to one side.

EDIT:

Addendum I

Recommended Reading:

Bubble Bursts: Was the entire Assange witchhunt a sting operation against CIA ? Theory submitted for Anon peer review.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLFhJg2K/was-the-entire-assange-witchhunt/

u/13Buddha/ : What we FACTUALLY Know About Julian Assange is not Veritas Verum. WikiLeaks IS Veritas Verum

https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLFgDTqD/what-we-factually-know-about-jul/