Why do you think it's tampering with evidence? They put a cover sheet on it to block classified documents from being photographed and who knows where those photos will end up.
It's similar to saying that evidence placed in a plastic evidence bag is tampering with it.
They removed items from their boxes, placed them on the floor and then put cover sheets on top of items that would not need them, all to make it look like there was much more top secret docs there then there actually was.
Could you tell me where you're getting the idea that it wasn't necessary for them to photograph all the documents they found?
And how do you know that some of those documents didn't need a cover sheet?
If they did remove documents and insert others for some nefarious reason, then yes, they should be prosecuted for that. But is this true, or is someone just making stuff up? What evidence is there this really happened?
Please don't tell me you saw it in some Twitter/X comment someone posted here and accepted it as truth without looking into it further.
Pull your head out of your ass and actually look at the reporting that Julie and others have done.
Smith already admitted that they removed material and inserted others.
They already admitted that the chain of custody and materials have been compromised.
You can see through a plastic bag but not a cover sheet. The cover sheet scam is the commies’ way of saying ‘there’s classified documents under our sheet, trust us.’
I'm curious to know what you believe happens to those documents after they've been admitted into evidence. Do you think no one ever looks at them again?
The fact is that those photographs of the files went public. Evidence should not be disclosed to the public during an ongoing investigation. It is the FIB's responsibility to protect classified material, and evidence from being made public.
Putting a sheet with big letters that read "CLASSIFIED" on top of evidence, and then taking pictures of it, and having those pics shown to the public is not acting in good faith to protect classified evidence. It was done as a dirty political stunt to influence public opinion of a political candidate, and the FIB is gonna get their asses busted for doing it.
And here I thought that tampering with evidence was a felony.
Silly me.
Why do you think it's tampering with evidence? They put a cover sheet on it to block classified documents from being photographed and who knows where those photos will end up.
It's similar to saying that evidence placed in a plastic evidence bag is tampering with it.
They removed items from their boxes, placed them on the floor and then put cover sheets on top of items that would not need them, all to make it look like there was much more top secret docs there then there actually was.
Plus, they removed some docs and inserted others.
That is evidence tampering.
Could you tell me where you're getting the idea that it wasn't necessary for them to photograph all the documents they found?
And how do you know that some of those documents didn't need a cover sheet?
If they did remove documents and insert others for some nefarious reason, then yes, they should be prosecuted for that. But is this true, or is someone just making stuff up? What evidence is there this really happened?
Please don't tell me you saw it in some Twitter/X comment someone posted here and accepted it as truth without looking into it further.
Pull your head out of your ass and actually look at the reporting that Julie and others have done.
Smith already admitted that they removed material and inserted others. They already admitted that the chain of custody and materials have been compromised.
Go search for yourself.
I refuse to spoon feed retards.
You can see through a plastic bag but not a cover sheet. The cover sheet scam is the commies’ way of saying ‘there’s classified documents under our sheet, trust us.’
I'm curious to know what you believe happens to those documents after they've been admitted into evidence. Do you think no one ever looks at them again?
The fact is that those photographs of the files went public. Evidence should not be disclosed to the public during an ongoing investigation. It is the FIB's responsibility to protect classified material, and evidence from being made public.
Putting a sheet with big letters that read "CLASSIFIED" on top of evidence, and then taking pictures of it, and having those pics shown to the public is not acting in good faith to protect classified evidence. It was done as a dirty political stunt to influence public opinion of a political candidate, and the FIB is gonna get their asses busted for doing it.