That is why we can claim the fabricated coversheets represent maliciously tainted evidence, and in no way indicates that those photos are of classified documents. We can show that the coversheets were in fact used to taint the alleged evidence. That is called tampering with evidence.

I simply disagree with you on this. There's really no point in going around and around on this. Ultimately, neither you nor I are in charge of determining if this is true or not. This is what the courts are for. I'm sure that Trump's lawyers will handle this effectively if it should ever go to trial, which I seriously doubt it will.

But then again, when it comes to things like this, it seems like the WHs are always in the background somewhere, doing what they do.

So, 🤷‍♀️. Who knows?

My goal is to get people to think more about what they believe and why they believe it. To not just believe anything put in front of them that confirms the beliefs they already have. To learn how to properly research something, and to understand that googling something and looking for a result that makes you happy, while ignoring everything else, is not research. To hold to the same standards, no matter who you're applying those standards to. To at least read articles that people share, and not just form opinions based only on the title of the article. To learn how to talk to people when you're trying to redpill them. To not taking things personally and becoming hostile when normies don't just automatically believe everything you say. To learn how to form persuasive arguments.

Because we're apparently not going to get out of this hellhole limbo until enough normies wake up and join us to join things. Or so people are saying.

And we're not going to get normies to join us by continuing to do what we're doing.

So I'm hopeful that if Anons are able to change how they approach this problem, maybe we can finally get out of this limbo.