That's a solid, concise overview of operational strategies.

To delve into the underlying conceptual and mission strategies for a moment... While the evil ones have used man's good nature (trust, empathy, generosity) against them through manipulation and deception, the WHs used the evil ones' hubris against them. It's my understanding that, while this cycle of control-then-pushback has been occurring for centuries, this time the goal of the WHs is somewhat different. This time the exercise is not to push the evil ones back in line, but rather to encourage them, even the low-level demons amongst them, to slither out from underneath their slimy rocks and expose themselves by allowing them to think they're ruling the proverbial roost - a false sense of security. This time the exercise is to bring them all out into the light and then eradicate them.

While the operational removal of the upper echelon was key and could only be achieved by military means, your fourth point of the evil ones losing control of the narrative has been the turning point, imho.

Your comment also brought to mind an interesting concept that was covered here years ago when I first found GAW (Nov-Dec 2020, different username) regarding Project Looking Glass. The general theory is that both sides had been using advanced technology to "game out" possibilities and probabilities and what ended up happening was that the timelines were converging around this time despite attempts to inject a plethora of variables to affect the outcome - and the WHs won no matter what the evil side tried.

At the time anons were questioning why it seems the evil ones deviated from their historically slow, methodical, decades-spanning strategy of eroding society and getting a stranglehold on the levers of control and instead seemed almost frenzied in their efforts to grab the reins at all costs, no matter what their exposure. It's as if they're working against a time constraint. They very well may be as this time we're in may be prophetic in nature. God wins either way, but we really do need to not only learn the lessons from these ordeals, but find a good way to communicate them to future generations.

To address the OP's post focus, this screw up with the debate may have been a calculated risk by the BHs to allow the public to see their puppet's diminished mental state - perhaps to steer us to an existential crisis then provide a "solution". The cost of the BH "solution" would, of course, be more loss of freedom. The referenced X/Twitter post citing the BH use of lawfare is, imo, highlighting their desperation, but keeping the Potatus in his position too long may or may not be a miscalculation as OP questions. I think the WHs are holding the proverbial rope and doling out just enough of it for the BHs to hang themselves with. BHs are still operational (in a greatly diminished capacity), but are being backed into a corner while WHs are trying to minimize any collateral damage. MHO