That's why the Gorsuch appointment was so important. I was surprised he didn't author the opinion, because he had signaled that it should probably be reversed before he was on SCOTUS. I still can't believe it's been overturned. I haven't felt this way - like a kid on Christmas - since a couple of weeks after Trump was in office.
It's almost impossible to overstate what this will allow Trump to do when he gets back in. The "Dictator" has returned power to the people by dismantling the agencies and "rules" that are really laws, which are made by the true dictators. He doesn't even have to do it. It's like he planted a poison pill that was activated after he walked a way. I don't think there's any going back from this for the deep state. Nothing Can Stop What is Coming.
Things are taking a BIG turn, lately.
Past 48 hours have been monumental.
Brandon showing the world his incompetence, and how the media has been lying to the People and covering it up.
Trump calling him "Brandon." (LOL)
House potentially FINALLY invoking their inherent power to jail government employees who refuse to be held accountable (AG Garland).
And all those Supreme Court decisions that are pointing towards getting back to Rule of Law and the rogue government getting back under constitutional control.
The "odd one out" sticks out like a sore thumb to me.
The social media case where the SCOTUS said that the parties lacked standing. WTF, right? But maybe not. This might actually be a sign of good things to come.
In one of the recent cases (I've been busy, and not much time to really dig), Roberts mentioned that common law was primarily for cases involving monetary compensation and fraud. Other cases would be equity cases (this is a gross simplification on my part).
I think this might be a hint that SCOTUS is getting back to constitutional law. The "licensed attorneys" have no clue about constitutional law. They think common law is a thing of the past. But it is not. I think Roberts is hinting at that.
Anyway, if the social media case was not properly argued by the attorneys, then it would make sense that the parties might not have standing. This could have been the problem with the election cases, as well.
It is possible that today's attorneys have been so misinformed about the law (via law school, the monopoly of the BAR association, and their own echo chamber), that they are filing their paperwork incorrectly, and thereby losing cases. This might be the beginning of getting back to consitutional law. Or maybe I am dreaming.
I believe the SCOTUS "lacks standing" in the social media case might be because some really big case may be coming say...maybe...Rico case involving all of the criminals conspiring together. A girl can hope and pray right?
lol damn i missed Trump calling him Brandon. Was that during the debate??
Yep, was funny