Amy Coney Barrett Rips Supreme Court’s Absurd January 6 Ruling - The Great Awakening

Amy Coney Barrett Rips Supreme Court’s Absurd January 6 Ruling (newrepublic.com)

posted 145 days ago by purkiss80 145 days ago by purkiss80 +61 / -0

Amy Coney Barrett Rips Supreme Court’s Absurd January 6 Ruling

Even Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett thinks her conservative colleagues went too far in their January 6 ruling.

43 comments

43 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (43)

sorted by:

▲ 35 ▼

– Raritan 35 points 145 days ago +35 / -0

She's a woman.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 13 ▼

– ArmyLady 13 points 145 days ago +13 / -0

I made that point yesterday . . .

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 11 ▼

– nothingberg 11 points 145 days ago +11 / -0

she's an AWFUL

affluent white feminist urban liberal

now you say, 'no she's not a feminist' or 'no she's not a liberal'

Um, excuse me, read more about her. ALL white women in america are feminists to some degree. Even a woman with a lot of children. Obviously she's a feminist because she's a scotus justice. Liberal? again, can't be a feminist without being a liberal

liberal also, btw, isn't a bad word. We're all liberals here. Liberalism is the very basis of our society, and it has to do with reclaiming and retaining our RIGHTS

Of course thanks to dems, we've become an illiberal (iLL + liberal) society, which means that our rights are iLL-usionary. They are pretend rights, and the STATE still has ultimate override powers

(Well, until Chevron that is)

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q