Amy Coney Barrett Rips Supreme Court’s Absurd January 6 Ruling
(newrepublic.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
The agreeing opinion of Jackson is also interesting to read. I Kekked out loud at this point:
red: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf
It is a footnote, unfortunately. But in here, she scathed the use of canon, phrased in latin, in an American proceeding. I am not sure if she meant to do so, but I kekked nonetheless.
Why? Because she uses the verb: to invoke. Usually, an incantation is used to invoke something. Using latin phrases to invoke something is kekistan worthy, since only magisters or magistrates or magi are supposed to invoke an incantation.
One has to wonder what reason could there be to invoke in latin. For the sake of argument, why not in Chinese? Let' s invoke the canon of Ni Hou, or nr.23: Babi Pangang and fried rice with sichuan sauce.
Or, one could invoke some Arabic incantations, no doubt.
The question is, why would a court bind itself to a Latin canon? wWhere does that come from? Where in the Declaration of independence or Constitution is it written? Does the Bill of Rights construct the protection of these rights to a Latin canon with the corresponding incantations?
Is the SCOTUS, of all it's alleged learned capacity, incapable of thinking for itself and finding the right moral compass, that it needs to defer to Latin Canon? Or any other foreign canon for that matter. Why not scourer the Quran for any light? As I said, consummation of a marriage with a nine 9 year old will make some people very very happy. Why not some obscure Sumerian clay tablet? I am sure the extend to which the Sumerians went in order to "write" things down, is only rivaled and surprised by us, former paper lovers and now digitally enhanced individuals.
In conclusion, there is no need, as the only canon a SCOTUS judge needs is the Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights and the Constitution and some common sense.
As opposed to Wisemann, Andrew, who loves to expand,or rather stretch things. He also teaches how to stretch things. I think it is almost time that this man is finally caught red handed.
Although when that happens, maybe we will then be starting to comprehend why the term: we save Israel for last, not mentioned one time, really means.
Amy & DEI hire are the canons pointed at the Pope.