Amy Coney Barrett Rips Supreme Court’s Absurd January 6 Ruling - The Great Awakening

Amy Coney Barrett Rips Supreme Court’s Absurd January 6 Ruling (newrepublic.com)

posted 147 days ago by purkiss80 147 days ago by purkiss80 +61 / -0

Amy Coney Barrett Rips Supreme Court’s Absurd January 6 Ruling

Even Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett thinks her conservative colleagues went too far in their January 6 ruling.

43 comments

43 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (43)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– nothingberg 2 points 147 days ago +2 / -0

The first clue that she's a plant is the fact she has THREE NAMES

This is a rule in the conspiratorium: Three names always equals fed plant. Yes, probably even Catherine Austin Fitts, as much as we idolize her.

"Coney" what's it make you think of? Coney Island. Coney dog. It makes you think of a hot dog with chili and mustard shat onto it with onions, or also an amusement park -- vacation spot.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Volpina 2 points 147 days ago +2 / -0

Oh, I re-wachted the movie Conspiracy Theory recently where the main character played by Mel Gibson explained the 3 names thing. We were warned long ago

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– ILoveIvermectin 2 points 146 days ago +2 / -0

I’ve heard about that 3 name thing John’s Wilkes booth. Lee Harvey Oswald. Mark David Chapin

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Volpina 2 points 146 days ago +2 / -0

It's like symbolism probably, to identify "their" players

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q