Why did General Nakasone join OpenAI? Because THIS. There is a TON of work to do!
(twitter.com)
🐸 WAG THE FROG 🐸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
So what if the military already has this tech? What kind of project might have used it? Is an AGI what was used to create the plan for the Great Awakening? Is it why Q always talks like they have a checkmate situation?
The theory has always been that 'they' are years to decades beyond what they let us see. So you ask a good question.
Are they giving us a reveal of what already is, acting as if it's just now happening?
There's a group of pro-vaccine professionals from various backgrounds on Twitter who I'm convinced are some form of AI.
https://twitter.com/IanCopeland5
Copeland (cope-land) in particular has stated that you'd never guess where he comes from, that he's "with the Army" and is a "PHD Level Geneticist".
If you visit their space you'll notice some strange and highly predictable patterns to their format. The rules are that the "anti-vaxx" crowd can come up to "debate" the issues, but they must only cite peer-reviewed sources from the "most-respected" scientific journals. They aren't allowed to use any logical fallacies (they are immediately muted and scolded if they do), smaller scale studies, their own reasoning, or evidence from a non-scientific context (e.g. monetary or power motivations).
Conversely--and infuriatingly--the pro-vaxx panel are able to use all of the logical fallacies--and proceed to do so judiciously. They're also permitted to cite smaller scale studies & non-RCT when it's convenient, etc.
In short, it's the most unfair debate format imaginable, and is essentially unwinnable for the anti-vaxx side because no anti-vaxx study would ever be published or funded.
But what I view it as is a white-hat created debate gauntlet. A training ground where white hats can search for new angles of attack based on the outcomes of the battles. What can humans do to give the AI a brain fart in these impossible scenarios?
They also occasionally throw in a bit of bait to make things interesting and give the combatants a bit of help (e.g. the Copeland character was given myocarditis in his 30s but vehemently denies that it's vaccine related).
You have to think there's no way so many full-time professionals would find the time to host what is essentially the same space every day to no productive end. I strongly suspect it's an AI creation.
Last thing:, the AI needs "a link" to begin, and is very insistent that participants in the debate give it a link before proceeding. Imagine an AI that is given the prompt:
^ With that you have Dr. Ian Copeland 5.
Fascinating.
very interesting