Just as a geological, and archeological reference: The Earth has had long, and short, warming and cooling cycles.
BTW. We ARE in a cool cycle (defined by Ice at caps) with relatively low CO2 levels. Dangerously low, actually - the low levels are threatening plant life. In this paradigm, we need more of it, to survive.
Why do you think glass-houses supplement their air with CO2?
Oh, 100%. Totally agree. I remember that senate (or might have been house) hearing where the "experts" were asked what the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere was, and they were making (wildly inaccurate) guesses "20%....18%.....12%..." "Wrong," they were informed, "it's less than half a %. If it gets much lower, all the plants will die, and so will we." They were all baffled. "Experts" are good that, it seems.
Plants love CO2. They give off O2. People love O2. It's a beautiful relationship.
Warming, cooling, it makes no difference. As long as members of "the big club" live in waterfront properties, this whole argument is bullchit.
Like Guam , Malta is floating up with the rise.
Don't tell Hank. He spooks easily.
But will it tip over and capsize?
Just as a geological, and archeological reference: The Earth has had long, and short, warming and cooling cycles.
BTW. We ARE in a cool cycle (defined by Ice at caps) with relatively low CO2 levels. Dangerously low, actually - the low levels are threatening plant life. In this paradigm, we need more of it, to survive.
Why do you think glass-houses supplement their air with CO2?
Oh, 100%. Totally agree. I remember that senate (or might have been house) hearing where the "experts" were asked what the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere was, and they were making (wildly inaccurate) guesses "20%....18%.....12%..." "Wrong," they were informed, "it's less than half a %. If it gets much lower, all the plants will die, and so will we." They were all baffled. "Experts" are good that, it seems.
Plants love CO2. They give off O2. People love O2. It's a beautiful relationship.