BAR stands for British Accredited Registry. Why be subject to the British. Let’s change it to ALR-American Lawyer Registry or U.S. L.R.-U.S. lawyer registry
Giuliani has a shelf of ring binders full of sworn affidavits from people who say they witnesses voting irregularities.
The courts came up with all kinds of excuses to not look at any of it: wrong court, too early - we have not had the election yet, too late - the election is already over, no standing - meaning nothing to do with you. Interestingly, the "no standing" excuse was applied even when Donald Trump brought the case! I am not quite sure who would have standing in that case.
No, but I have not personally seen Rudy Giuliani, either. It could all be a huge hoax.
However, I have seen a photograph of someone who claims to be Giuliani standing in front of a table with a set of ring binders on it which Giuliani is reported to have said that they are full of sworn affidavits concerning election fraud.
I have also found many links concerning election fraud in the US in 2020 and have put them into a website so that I have easy access to then. You might want to take a look?
No court would look at it and thus the irony. Everyone says it's lies but it's never been put to the test in court. I know that in America a person is supposed to be considered innocent until PROVEN guilty. I guess there's also a law that says that elections are supposed to be considered legitimate until proven otherwise. The problem is the courts don't want to face the otherwise situation so they punt. The Dems know this and thus the reason they cheat.
BAR stands for British Accredited Registry. Why be subject to the British. Let’s change it to ALR-American Lawyer Registry or U.S. L.R.-U.S. lawyer registry
It's Not going to work...
"We have it all"
YES!! AMEN!!
AND.... God's Justice is ETERNAL! 🙌
Giuliani has a shelf of ring binders full of sworn affidavits from people who say they witnesses voting irregularities.
The courts came up with all kinds of excuses to not look at any of it: wrong court, too early - we have not had the election yet, too late - the election is already over, no standing - meaning nothing to do with you. Interestingly, the "no standing" excuse was applied even when Donald Trump brought the case! I am not quite sure who would have standing in that case.
No, but I have not personally seen Rudy Giuliani, either. It could all be a huge hoax.
However, I have seen a photograph of someone who claims to be Giuliani standing in front of a table with a set of ring binders on it which Giuliani is reported to have said that they are full of sworn affidavits concerning election fraud.
I have also found many links concerning election fraud in the US in 2020 and have put them into a website so that I have easy access to then. You might want to take a look?
http://2020election.jottings.website/
And here is someone claiming to be Giuliani showing us some of those documents.
No court would look at it and thus the irony. Everyone says it's lies but it's never been put to the test in court. I know that in America a person is supposed to be considered innocent until PROVEN guilty. I guess there's also a law that says that elections are supposed to be considered legitimate until proven otherwise. The problem is the courts don't want to face the otherwise situation so they punt. The Dems know this and thus the reason they cheat.