Amy Coney Barrett's 'Trojan Horse'
(www.americanthinker.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
I agree in part; Not a universal argument against all women, I've known many women in my life who decry this philosophy of bigger government and more handouts and programs for "the needy", but there are plenty of others around whose beliefs would support your thesis. I think the deeper problem is that the vote is extended to far too many of both sexes who don't have much/any financial "skin" in the game, and are bamboozled by those who would promise them the world just to gain power for themselves.
That is the kicker. Most with skin in the game, tend to vote Conservative. Because until something affects an individual personally, they vote for free stuff. I do think there should be a limiting factor. They already prevent felons from voting right? So, why not add those with no job, on welfare, food stamps, etc.
It's a good idea. Might motivate some folks to get off the generational welfare ride.