Americans Are Already Sticking It To The Permanent Bureaucracy Just Days After Landmark Supreme Court Ruling!
(dailycallernewsfoundation.org)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Gun or Rope.
Wouldn't rope be cheaper?
He should take civil action against any of the civil servants involved.
Sue them for all of his costs, loss of earnings and time.
Only when they are held personally accountable this will stop.
Well, Washington D.C. was built on a literal swamp. Can we declare it a wetland and raze it to the ground?
Hmm - We could go back to Philly, PA... and restart a Constitutional Republic there.....
To be honest ; I’m a bit uninformed/ don’t have the knowledge conserning this isssue , But the “we are winning” I get ,,, love it !!! Actually reading now to get a bit of understanding !
They deprive Americans of the use of their land by calling it a wetland,all over America. You have to pay taxes on the land but you can't use it. It's also very arbitrary.
Yep and what's interesting is contractors can wipe out every tree and fill in any wet areas here in Florida and causing water run off. Then, the food zone changes and bingo, your insurance goes up because now your land floods.
Their are probably hundreds of thousands of those swamps in america......
They are just trying to stop development.
Yup, grew up on 8acre property and the back half is considered "wetland" cant build or disturb the ground back there" or I think it was 10feet from it. The entire area use to be a marshy once (a good few feet of pure peatmoss throughout the entire property and surrounding properties) I guess and they had drained it a long time ago, a drainage ditch runs through that back part and it overflows and create the marsh (dries up every summer xept the pond spot). While, I do not mind the marshland, it is neat to see the water birds, ducks, geese, frogs and the wildlife in general back there, sure would of been nice to build a Gazebo and maybe a lil fairy Brook bridge on one of the areas that is a bit more elevated than the wet parts, to be able to sit down and enjoy the scenery. The drainage does not stop on our property, it continues down through a few others and it always has been a shallow drainage that let out near some farmland. The farmers on that land made use of the yearly water there and it started to dry up because, again the canal was shallow and over time it was just spreading out around the back of our property instead of continuing down the line so.. those farmers contacted my mom and asked if they could dredge the ditch a foot or two to allow the water to flow again and she agreed to they came out and did just that.. Just about time they were done they got a court order to STOP.. ridicules, they were just returning it to how it use to be just 10yrs prior.. anyway.. dont know much more of that story but, first time I was old enough to understand that, the back of our property we pay for, we cant even really use or touch or build on cuz of "muh wetlands"
Calling a trucking company a mine just because they haul coal occasionally is ridiculous. Mine safety rules are extremely detailed and specific to mining issues. Making a trucking company adhere to them is nuts.
Its a mobile coal mine you nazi. Do u even climate bro??
concerning