So let's go down the list here:

No ... it is not.

(Wow, that was easy.)

Prove it. Where's the real, tangible difference? What makes national socialism so drastically different that they can't be conflated, to the extent you would say the same things a leftist would ("REAL socialism has never been tried before!")

Why would it work better? What are its economic benefits, what are its detriments, and how is it different than the idealistic utopia dreamt up by the rest of the naive socialists?

The same could be said of your opinions.

Cool, but you'll have to do a lot of gaslighting to minimize my opinions when they are compared against Hitler's.

Hitler was not provoking war

For a man who wasn't provoking war, he certainly had a massive war machine with some seriously cutting edge technologies, engineering and battle tactics that the European theater could not hope to contend with.

Also, he had just about the most fashionable uniform in military history and that on its own was provoking war because everyone else coveted such sharp dresswear.

There were no gas chambers, ergo there was no Holocaust.

There is no need to even respond to this, because I already said this qualification is pointless. It doesn't matter for this discussion, because there are enough real journals kept from the era that people have found in the attics or under floorboards or wherever that describe independently of what mainstream media or curated published works try to say.

When 90% of Holocaust information is curated works, it ceases to have a point when it comes to discussion.

just because you don't like what he said doesn't mean what he said was not true.

It doesn't matter whether I like what he says or doesn't, it is easy to romanticize socialism and the world has seen enough about how "this one kind of socialism is different from all the others!"

... out-of-hand because you don't want to read it.

I have repeatedly bashed the left in this very forum nearly every time Hitler comes up because they will label you a Nazi for wanting to read or having read books like Mein Kampf.

I absolutely want to read works from historical figures, especially one we are only ever getting one side of.

The hostility is ridiculous.

I did not say the opinions outlined in the above post didn't matter, but now I certainly challenge you to provide proof that national socialism is different, better and more functional without the same inevitable drawbacks it always suffers from.