Farage Party Would Have Won 94 Seats Under Proportional Voting System: Report - The Great Awakening

Farage Party Would Have Won 94 Seats Under Proportional Voting System: Report (www.breitbart.com)

posted 130 days ago by LakotaPride 130 days ago by LakotaPride +63 / -0

Farage Party Would Have Won 94 Seats Under Proportional System

Nigel Farage's Reform UK won over four million votes but only secured five seats in the House of Commons, sparking calls for electoral reform.

20 comments

20 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (20)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– The_Watcher 4 points 130 days ago +4 / -0

"Rigged" might be a bit strong but the current system really only works for a two party system. If there are more than two parties then the others stand a chance of not being properly represented.

The LibDems who usually come in third have always campaigned for Proportional Representation but this time I think they got as many seats as their proportion of the vote justified.

Reform UK fared badly. They got about 40% of the votes that Labour had but only just over 1% of the seats.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Tynyyn 3 points 130 days ago +3 / -0

But the reform party got their foot in the door. It's a slow start, but it is a start. Plus I'd think that Farage will be a obstacle to the left in implimenting their agenda. Who knows, Farage could just slow down their steady march or at least cast some light onto their policies. Yea, he got screwed with the apportionment of seats, yet for some reason I think it is part of the Q plan.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– swampbeast 1 point 129 days ago +1 / -0

I hope it's not that long after the US that the UK gets fixed. It should be easier once people see the US.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q